| Tango01 | 20 Feb 2017 9:24 p.m. PST |
|
| chironex | 21 Feb 2017 4:02 a.m. PST |
This doesn't look very Western. Too British-styled. |
| WillieB | 21 Feb 2017 9:10 a.m. PST |
Will look splendid in my Indian Mutiny setting! |
| Murvihill | 21 Feb 2017 9:58 a.m. PST |
There's no fringe on top! |
| rmaker | 21 Feb 2017 10:53 a.m. PST |
There's no fringe on top! And it's the wrong colors! And no isinglass curtains, either. |
| Tango01 | 21 Feb 2017 12:05 p.m. PST |
Glad you like it my friend!. (smile) By the way…. "A surrey is a "popular American doorless, four-wheeled carriage of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Usually two-seated (for four passengers), surreys had a variety of tops, ranging from the rigid, fringed canopy-top … to parasol and extension tops."[1] The seats were traditional, spindle-backed (often upholstered), bench seats…"
From Wiki.
Amicalement
Armand
|
| donlowry | 21 Feb 2017 6:58 p.m. PST |
I thought Surrey's were pulled by a team of 2 horses. |
| oldjarhead1 | 22 Feb 2017 8:31 a.m. PST |
|
| Tango01 | 22 Feb 2017 10:56 a.m. PST |
A question… can be used for the ACW by some rich people of the Confederation or not?…
Amicalement
Armand
|
| WillieB | 22 Feb 2017 5:37 p.m. PST |
Yes, Armand they were used during the ACW by both sides and the general population. In fact Redoubt has a very nice Surrey in their ACW range with Union and Confederate officers as well as civilians. |
| Tango01 | 23 Feb 2017 10:40 a.m. PST |
Many thanks my friend!.
Amicalement
Armand
|
bases them up.
