Hi all,
I am looking at the issue of commanders (army or battalion) in the English Wars of the Roses, and am struggling to assess how to evaluate individuals' military abilities?
Might anyone please suggest either attributes or instances that one could use in pursuing this line?
For example, at the TACTICAL level:
--Warwick killed his horse before Towton, demonstrating (we suppose) the ability to INSPIRE his men.
--Richard III personally slew Henry's standard bearer at Bosworth, showing HORSEMANSHIP/SKILL-AT-ARMS.
--What more was there to tactical-level leadership? How much control did commanders really exert once battle commenced?
How else might you measure a commander's military abilities, beyond the tactical level? What did they need at the OPERATIONAL level, for example?
Are there any books that I can grab that might focus on this specific issue – any thematic studies of warfare of the period, for example, that look at the issues of command?
I should add that I am quite interested in Richard III himself, so any pointers regarding him would be especially fascinating.
Many, many, many thanks in advance for *any* tips and advice, folks!!