"Migration to Kingdom - assessment of the three scenarios" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Scenarios Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article The fifth Warband stand for the Army for Bill.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
 timurilank  | 08 Jan 2017 4:00 a.m. PST |
In my assessment of the Migration to Kingdom game I noted several changes I had made for the last scenario (409 AD). These worked well and if the game were to be done again would certainly be added to the first scenario. To reflect the political friction that developed during the course of the three year period I simply reduced Constantine III's ability to replenish his losses as provinces were deemed their immediate security had precedence. This forced the Roman player to source allies from a ready supply – the barbarians. This opened a level of diplomacy that had not been planned in the scenario but developed naturally and may have well took place historically. You can read the full assessment here. link The work was enjoyable to do and naturally has stimulated further activity in the 5th century. The Migration to Kingdom will continue but with new players. Cheers,
Robert |
| goragrad | 09 Jan 2017 2:09 p.m. PST |
Will have to see if I can get the nephew interested. He is more inclined to do pickup random games with one of his favorites. Might be back in Denver soon though and can see about this at the club. |
|
