"The Concept of ‘Total War’ in the Revolutionary–Napoleonic" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.
Featured Profile ArticleTaking a look at elements in Land of the Free.
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 06 Jan 2017 9:41 p.m. PST |
…Period. "On 23 August 1793 the National Convention decreed the levée enmasse. This was the declaration of war on a new scale, in two quitedistinct ways. The term of course means mass conscription, which was first embodied by the revolutionary decree of February 1793, when the Convention had called for 350 000 men – a levée in the usually understood sense. As R. R. Palmer pointed out long ago, however, levée has another, more profound meaning, that of a mass rising, a phenomenon quite the reverse of conscription. The latter sense was what was intended in the decree of 23 August. The French were exhorted to rise up as one nation, to do more than render unto Paris their sons for the front, but for all and sundry to join in a collective war effort. Married men were to make munitions; women were to be nurses and seamstresses for the armies; old men were to tell tales in the market place of heroic deeds, thus arousing loyalty to the republic as the children listened and learned. These are two faces of the hydra head of total war: on the one hand the relentless imposition of the machinery of the bureaucratic state on hitherto seemingly unassailable hinterlands; on the other, the hope that none of this will be needed, that the people will rise spontaneously as one, in a people's war, without coercion, without resistance or recalcitrance. The first happened; the second did not, if not for …" Main page link Amicalement Armand |
15th Hussar | 07 Jan 2017 2:59 a.m. PST |
|
Tango01 | 07 Jan 2017 10:56 a.m. PST |
Thanks my friend!. (smile) Amicalement Armand
|
|