Help support TMP


"Calivers versus Muskets" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board

Back to the English Civil War Message Board



621 hits since 15 Nov 2016
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Timbo W15 Nov 2016 9:48 a.m. PST

Hi all, I was perusing the Ormonde manuscripts and found out that several Irish Confederate infantry regiments had a mixture of calivers and muskets as late as 1649.

How would you represent calivers in typical ECW rules?

Perhaps fire as muskets but no long range fire?
Perhaps a '-1' at all ranges?
Just a '-1' at long range?

What do you think?

Personal logo The Beast Rampant Supporting Member of TMP15 Nov 2016 11:45 a.m. PST

I'd do both A and B- no long range, one bracket down in effectiveness.

Guillaume deGuy Supporting Member of TMP15 Nov 2016 11:57 a.m. PST

Using Impetus:Baroque, I treat calivers as arquebus – slightly more then one step down in range and hit probability.

Oh Bugger15 Nov 2016 4:49 p.m. PST

Calivers can fire 3 times to the Musket's 1 or two iirc. The latter has a longer range and greater impact. We did this one a while ago with some well informed contributions.

For gaming purposes with mixed Musket and Caliver armed units I might just go with -1 at long range. The rationale being the denser fire of the Caliver offsets its weaker impact.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.