Help support TMP


"What Is the Islamic State Without a State?" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Battle Captain


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

C-in-C's 1:285 Soviet SAU122

Need some armored artillery vehicles?


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


722 hits since 22 Oct 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0122 Oct 2016 10:10 p.m. PST

"Each square mile lost chips away at ISIS's reason for being. As my colleague Graeme Wood wrote last year, "Caliphates cannot exist as underground movements, because territorial authority is a requirement." What exactly is the Islamic State, if the "state" all but disappears?…"

More here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1122 Oct 2016 10:13 p.m. PST

The world's most brutal and effective terrorist organization?

Tango0122 Oct 2016 10:27 p.m. PST

Chapeaux mon ami!. (big smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Mikasa23 Oct 2016 3:30 a.m. PST

@The world's most brutal and effective terrorist organization?@

I thought that was Goldman Saachs

Lion in the Stars23 Oct 2016 4:59 a.m. PST

A large group of war criminals?

Pictors Studio23 Oct 2016 7:48 a.m. PST

A jar?

Andy ONeill23 Oct 2016 8:22 a.m. PST

Islamic?

I've always considered them brutal terrorists. Did they ever really stand a chance of becoming a viable state?

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse23 Oct 2016 9:04 a.m. PST

Yes, terrorists … of the lowest order. The best thing that could happen is eliminate all of Daesh. So they can't become anything but dead … I know … I know … It's wishful thinking … but I can dream, can't I ?

Personal logo Saber6 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian23 Oct 2016 9:31 a.m. PST

Bandits

15mm and 28mm Fanatik23 Oct 2016 9:38 a.m. PST

I gotta admit I was a bit skeptical at first, but the POTUS made good on his promise to "degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL" during his speech a little over two years ago.

He deserves credit for this plus the killing of Osama bin Laden.

Hafen von Schlockenberg23 Oct 2016 9:47 a.m. PST

Pictor's--LOL(or at least,a good chuckle!)

Mako1123 Oct 2016 5:47 p.m. PST

I thought the Seals did that.

I suspect you are a bit premature on the whole "destruction of ISIL" thing (a pity they waited so long to get serious about attacking them), especially since the liberation forces are still 5 miles from Mosul, and Raqqa isn't even being looked at currently, not to mention all their other affiliate branches in 30+ countries.

Rod I Robertson24 Oct 2016 1:41 a.m. PST

Taking Mosul is doable because it is in Iraq and the Iraqi Army and the Kurds are acting as proxies in the attack. Who will be the boots on the ground in an attack on Raqqa in Syria? The US-led Coalition does not have enough proxies in Syria to take Raqqa. Will it cooperate with the Assad Regime and the Russians to allow them to retake this last ISIL hub? Will it push Iraqi troops to attack Syria as one of the presidential candidates seemed to indicate in the third US presidential debate? There are insufficient Syrian Kurds and they are too dispersed to do such an attack on Raqqa. How will this last great nut of the ISIL Caliphate be cracked?

Cheers.
Rod Robertson.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse24 Oct 2016 8:24 a.m. PST

The various arab/moslem forces in Iraqi will retake Mosul sooner than later. Most likely killing Baghdadi[I hope]. The question is who will control it ? The Kurds ? The Iraqi gov't ? The IRGC supported Iraqi Shia militias ? Again, I see another civil war in the making.

Raqqa will fall to Assad heavily supported by the Russians. It may look like the dark side of the Moon in the end. With huge civilian losses. However, Syria will eventually be mostly under Assad's control.

Lesson Learned [or should be by the US !] : Do Not remove Mid East Dictators/Tyrants. E.g. Saddam and Ghaddafi …

Crazyivanov25 Oct 2016 2:51 a.m. PST

If the Iraqi government has a good deal going with the Kurds and Shias, then it will remain Iraqi territory, the Kurds get to keep whatever weaponry and cash reserves they can get from dead Daesh fighters, and Shia get to bask in the knowledge that they have saved whatever Shias live in the region by fighting a hateful Sunni organization.

If they haven't thought that far ahead, the Kurds and Shia will likely fight over either territory or loot, while the Iraqi army sates their own greed.

Hopefully the former will happen, but its 2016 so always be ready for a let down.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse25 Oct 2016 8:38 a.m. PST

Yes, the Iraqi government/leadership likes having someone else fight their battles it appears ….

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.