Help support TMP


"Mary rose" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board

Back to the Age of Sail Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Crossbowmen 1410

The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!


Featured Workbench Article

Simple Magnetic Flight Stands

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes another stab at building a more perfect flight stand.


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


1,006 hits since 1 Oct 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
cantbeatdavy01 Oct 2016 3:32 p.m. PST

Quick question….any idea what side the Mary Rose came to rest on?

JimDuncanUK01 Oct 2016 3:47 p.m. PST

Starboard

cantbeatdavy01 Oct 2016 3:47 p.m. PST

Cheers……

cantbeatdavy01 Oct 2016 3:52 p.m. PST

Uuummm….could be assumethat she sank in that position,so to speak?or could she have rotated on the way down?I guess the question is….if you could see the ship sinking today would it be starboard side down??

Winston Smith01 Oct 2016 3:56 p.m. PST

Is there money riding on this?

cantbeatdavy01 Oct 2016 4:10 p.m. PST

Not really….just my credibility!!!aiming for correct uniform/standards/colours for my latest Renaissance army…lol

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP01 Oct 2016 5:19 p.m. PST

I've got a print of the old painting showing the sinking up in my study--my wife was a serious Tudor freak--and it's listing heavily to port. But there ARE books on the subject, not to mention the museum.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP01 Oct 2016 5:29 p.m. PST

Here we go: "Early in the battle something went wrong. While engaging the French galleys the Mary Rose suddenly heeled (leaned) heavily over to her starboard (right) side and water rushed in through the open gunports." from wikipedia, but footnoted to Peter Marsden, Sealed in Time (2003).

Charlie 1201 Oct 2016 6:51 p.m. PST

Sank after healing to starboard (cause? several to choose from). Came to rest on her starboard side (as indicated by the ship herself on display). Water too shallow for her to rotate while sinking.

bsrlee02 Oct 2016 1:57 a.m. PST

However there were several attempts to raise the ship including running cables from windlasses on shore to the ship – they eventually pulled the masts out entirely. The Tudor era salvagers also managed to dig tunnels under the ship and get cables under the hull and tried to use barges and the tide to raise her but by the time they did that she was too stuck fast in the clay mud bottom. Quite a feat for 'free divers', the cables were left in place to be found by the modern excavators.

cantbeatdavy02 Oct 2016 3:40 a.m. PST

And we have a winner…….cheers all

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.