"Play Test of "For King and Parliament" Rules" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the English Civil War Message Board
|
 ColCampbell  | 24 Sep 2016 5:57 p.m. PST |
Simon Miller (of BigRedBat's Shop bigredbatshop.co.uk ) is developing a variant of his "To the Strongest!" ancient/medieval rule set. The Jackson Gamers are participating in the play test development and ran a game this past Thursday. Please drop by Col Campbell's Barracks for a brief report: link Jim |
| Codsticker | 26 Sep 2016 8:27 a.m. PST |
Montgomery looks to be a popular scenario these days (or is it just that it is the default play test scenario for Mr.Miller's rules?). |
| ColCampbell | 26 Sep 2016 8:32 a.m. PST |
It is the default scenario included as part of the play test rule package. Jim |
| mollinary | 27 Sep 2016 3:24 a.m. PST |
It was included because there was an excellent base scenario done by Bob Giglio in his second ECW scenario booklet, and it had also been used in a couple of other recent rule sets (I think "This War without an Enemie" was one) so people could compare.
In addition it is a very playable size, with enough units to act as a reasonable test of the rules, while not requiring playtesters to have the full armies for Marston Moor! Mollinary |
| Dexter Ward | 28 Sep 2016 1:58 a.m. PST |
Montgomery is also the scenario in 'To Defy a King'.
It's a good size for a wargame, fairly balanced, and has troops entering after the start, so is interesting. |
| Codsticker | 28 Sep 2016 8:01 a.m. PST |
… it had also been used in a couple of other recent rule sets (I think "This War without an Enemie" was one)… Yes, we have played it a couple of times using a couple of different sets of rules, starting with WWaE for that reason. BTW, I love the Giglio scenario books. |
|
