/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "Play Test of "For King and Parliament" Rules" Topic

 Help support TMP


"Play Test of "For King and Parliament" Rules" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the English Civil War Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Regiment of Foote


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Fighting 15's Teutonic Order Command 1410

Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


2,436 hits since 24 Sep 2016
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP24 Sep 2016 5:57 p.m. PST

Simon Miller (of BigRedBat's Shop bigredbatshop.co.uk ) is developing a variant of his "To the Strongest!" ancient/medieval rule set. The Jackson Gamers are participating in the play test development and ran a game this past Thursday.

Please drop by Col Campbell's Barracks for a brief report: link

Jim

Codsticker26 Sep 2016 8:27 a.m. PST

Montgomery looks to be a popular scenario these days (or is it just that it is the default play test scenario for Mr.Miller's rules?).

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP26 Sep 2016 8:32 a.m. PST

It is the default scenario included as part of the play test rule package.

Jim

Mollinary27 Sep 2016 3:24 a.m. PST

It was included because there was an excellent base scenario done by Bob Giglio in his second ECW scenario booklet, and it had also been used in a couple of other recent rule sets (I think "This War without an Enemie" was one) so people could compare.
In addition it is a very playable size, with enough units to act as a reasonable test of the rules, while not requiring playtesters to have the full armies for Marston Moor!

Mollinary

Dexter Ward28 Sep 2016 1:58 a.m. PST

Montgomery is also the scenario in 'To Defy a King'.
It's a good size for a wargame, fairly balanced, and has troops entering after the start, so is interesting.

Codsticker28 Sep 2016 8:01 a.m. PST

… it had also been used in a couple of other recent rule sets (I think "This War without an Enemie" was one)…

Yes, we have played it a couple of times using a couple of different sets of rules, starting with WWaE for that reason. BTW, I love the Giglio scenario books.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.