"The Mghty Kirov Class" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Crabbman | 07 Sep 2016 5:11 a.m. PST |
|
GarrisonMiniatures | 07 Sep 2016 5:21 a.m. PST |
A more interesting part of this article was the link describing how Russia can't afford it's military. link |
Crabbman | 07 Sep 2016 5:29 a.m. PST |
Basically the same situation that I have with wargaming miniatures… I want a large force with hundreds of new perfectly painted miniatures but in reality can only afford a small second hand one with a crap paint job! |
Mako11 | 07 Sep 2016 10:41 a.m. PST |
Yep, my "defense budgets" aren't what they used to be either, especially since two or more nations usually need that at the same time. Love that battlecruiser. Certainly a "looker", and very well armed too. Wish we had a few of them, since they are so stunning, but no, we get a butt-ugly arsenal ship instead, which looks ready to turn turtle at the first sign of rough water. |
Virtualscratchbuilder | 07 Sep 2016 2:19 p.m. PST |
The late Tom Clancy had an ironic sense of humor… Kirov being taken out by a 435 ton coastal submarine. |
Lion in the Stars | 07 Sep 2016 3:37 p.m. PST |
No irony, Kirovs are weak in ASW. And a pair of Mk37s or Mk48s would blow the crap out of just about anything short of a carrier. |
Virtualscratchbuilder | 07 Sep 2016 6:38 p.m. PST |
Yeah, but she was surrounded by ASW ships at the time of her demise. |
Lion in the Stars | 08 Sep 2016 12:08 p.m. PST |
So are US carriers, but that doesn't stop good/determined/lucky submarines from any nation from getting close. Been there, done that, got periscope photos in the patrol report. |
LostPict | 13 Sep 2016 6:59 a.m. PST |
You know it is really like rock-paper-scissors. Pig-boats kill skimmers, airdales kill pig-boats, skimmers kill airdales and missiles kill all. A real navy needs all that stuff including assets like the poor little LCS, ugly old Zumwalt, mighty Arleigh Burkes and Ticos, gator-freighters, and the brass-beloved carriers. The real question is does a Navy's opposition have sufficient resources "To conduct prompt and sustained combat operations at Sea" long enough to carry the battle and win the war? I only know of one Navy that will still be mostly floating after a real Navy War and it is probably not the folks that sail the might Kirov. ;-) |
|