Help support TMP


"Fantastic Four - Right and Wrong." Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Oldies But Goodies

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian brings back some oldies.


Featured Profile Article

Visiting Reaper - 2000!

The Editor takes a virtual tour of Reaper's new offices.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


744 hits since 19 Aug 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0119 Aug 2016 10:28 p.m. PST

"In Cinemautopsy, we look back at a recent, high-profile failure and ask a simple question: What the hell happened? In this installment… the comic that launched Marvel Comics. A cast of beloved up-and-comers. One of the hottest young directors in Hollywood. A bold attempt to reinvent the superhero genre. What could possibly go wrong?

Many things. Many things could go wrong. And did…"
More here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Vigilant20 Aug 2016 3:45 a.m. PST

Just seemed to have been made by people who had never read a Fantastic Four comic. Biggest waste of my money since Alexander!

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP20 Aug 2016 4:31 a.m. PST

The quick test of a Fantastic Four movie is to see what they've done with Doctor Doom. If the "creative" team running the movie think they can improve on the Lee & Kirby version of Victor von Doom, they probably won't get anything else right either.

Dan Wideman II20 Aug 2016 8:00 a.m. PST

The sad thing about that article is that even what they call the good points are things that turned me off to the movie. If I am going to a movie about a particular Intellectual Property with established characters I want to see THOSE characters, not some reimagined younger version of them. For the FF this means a couple of things.

Reed/Sue are something of a May/December romance. In the comics he is at least 15 or so years older.

Ben is about the same age as Reed.

Sue and Johnny are biological siblings. I know the article will call me closed minded, but suddenly switching the ethnicity of one half of a sibling pair is too jarring a change.

Victor Von Doom needs to be Victor Von Doom, Eastern European kingdom and all.

Once you try to reinvent all those things you are making a completely different movie. (which by itself COULD be good) Take note the best performing superhero movies are the ones staying as close as possible to the source materiel. You'd think someone other than Marvel/Disney would start to realize that. Instead in the constant need for creative reinvention Hollywood is killing the golden goose.

Coelacanth193820 Aug 2016 1:07 p.m. PST

The Thing had no pants.

Bunkermeister Supporting Member of TMP20 Aug 2016 1:51 p.m. PST

Dan Wideman II is absolutely correct. Hollywood wants to do a comic book story or a remake of an old movie or TV show because there is a built in fan base. Then don't anger that fan base by changing the characters. I did not go see FF precisely because of what Dan Wideman said.

If you want to make a movie similar to the Fantastic Four, then call it something else and I might go watch it. I might even enjoy it. But don't mess with beloved characters.

Mike Bunkermeister Creek
Bunker Talk blog

cfuzwuz20 Aug 2016 9:23 p.m. PST

Amen to Bunk and Dan.

Howler22 Aug 2016 8:36 p.m. PST

The very same reasons I'm not a very big fan of the new Star Trek.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.