"Mortem et Gloriam - 3rd Servile War Campaign" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article The final warband for the Army for Bill.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
| listlurker | 19 Aug 2016 4:16 a.m. PST |
|
| Caliban | 19 Aug 2016 7:34 a.m. PST |
Thanks for posting, Simon, the walkthrough the initial pre-battle phase was illuminating… |
| Saurocet | 20 Aug 2016 3:14 a.m. PST |
A quote from the blog -- "The Roman army chose to float Crassus and let his subordinates take the strain. With hindsight Pete thought that this was not such a good idea, but I'm not so sure. Certainly it demonstrated the difference in the command structure." I would like to know more about this statement and how command is structured in MeG. One reason I don't like DBA/DBM is that the pip system is used for all armies, unlike the game system in GMT's Great Battles of History where Romans, Macedonians, and others have different command systems. In other words, why do most game rules simulate differences in weapon systems but in command and control? This one statement about "difference in the command structure" has really caught my attention about MeG. I'm intrigued. |
|
finally paints the first of his Gauls...
