Help support TMP


"Battle of Shiloh: Shattering Myths" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds artillery to his soft-plastic Union forces.


Featured Profile Article

Coker House Restored

Personal logo reeves lk Supporting Member of TMP updates us on progress at this Champion Hill landmark.


Featured Book Review


1,629 hits since 22 Jul 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0122 Jul 2016 1:09 p.m. PST

"The Battle of Shiloh, which took place on April 6-7, 1862, is one of the Civil War's most momentous fights, but perhaps one of the least understood. The standard story of the engagement reads that Union troops were surprised in their camps at dawn on April 6. Defeat seemed certain, but Union Brigadier General Benjamin M. Prentiss saved the day by holding a sunken road some 3 feet deep. Thanks to the tenacious fighting in that area, it came to be known as the Hornet's Nest.

Prentiss eventually capitulated, leaving Rebel commander General Albert Sidney Johnston in a position to drive on to victory. General Johnston, however, was soon mortally wounded and replaced by General P.G.T. Beauregard, which cost the Confederates vital momentum. Beauregard made the inept decision to call off the Confederate attacks, and the next day Union counterattacks dealt Rebel hopes a crushing blow…"
More here
link

Amicalement
Armand

nazrat22 Jul 2016 3:29 p.m. PST

Sounds like an interesting book!

donlowry23 Jul 2016 8:49 a.m. PST

I suppose some of those old legends are still floating around somewhere, but most, probably all, of them have been debunked a long time ago.

Tango0123 Jul 2016 10:16 a.m. PST

Glad you like it my friend!. (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Garde de Paris23 Jul 2016 10:47 a.m. PST

I focus on the 7YW and the Napoleonic War in the Peninsula. and am no student of the ACW. However:

Many years ago – it may have been reading Bruce Catton – I became convinced that the New York Times was a true "rag," a worthless piece of garbage, for…

When the NYT correspondent arrive at Pittsburgh Landing, he found hundreds/thousands of Union skulkers hiding against the bank of the river where the boats unloaded troops. Many told them the were attacked while still asleep, many friends bayoneted as they slept, etc. (to cover their own first-battle panic).


Also, for such a competent general, I do NOT understand how Johnston could have organized the attack with one command after the other spread all across the Confederate line! He graduated from the USMA in 1826, 8th out of 41, and I believe even then they knew of the Napoleonic Corps organization of battalions/regiments upward into brigades; brigades into Divisions, Divisions into Corps and corps into Armies.

The French, where they could, sent forces forward into battle with each Division on a narrow, perhaps one-brigade front, with other brigades of the division deployed behind them in depth.


A Jonston division should have gone forward with one brigade front, followed by the next brigade of the division, etc. Deploy in depth, feed reinforcements into the first line from the same division with the same General de Division (French).


In this attack, the separate divisions became inter-mingled, unable to keep forward momentum in a unified manner. Major cause of the ultimate defeat – even before the battle started.

GdeP

Rev Zoom25 Jul 2016 1:29 p.m. PST

Not to burst any bubbles, but the so called sunken road at the Hornet's Nest was hardly a sunken road at all. Per the Park Rangers, the road has not changed since the battle in terms of depth – 6 inches at most. What Prentiss' men did have was thick cover with the Confederates coming across open fields. That, and a whole lot of guts and determination.

donlowry26 Jul 2016 8:32 a.m. PST

Jeff Davis said, in effect, "If Sidney Johnston isn't a general, I don't know who is." Truer words were never spoken -- than the latter phrase.

nazrat26 Jul 2016 11:53 a.m. PST

"Not to burst any bubbles, but the so called sunken road at the Hornet's Nest was hardly a sunken road at all."

No bubbles to burst here at all. If you had bothered to read the article you might have seen that they debunk that myth at length…

Maxshadow17 Aug 2016 10:45 p.m. PST

Brilliant article thanks Tango!

FreemanL18 Aug 2016 4:54 a.m. PST

I went to the Shiloh battlefield for the 150th Anniversary. My friends and I walked all of it and it was a great experience. What made it even more special were all of the candles that were being laid out to mark casualties roughly where they occurred. It was both sobering and poignant to see the trailers and carrying devices full of candles – and there were of course already many across the Hornet's Nest battleground. Bloody Pond was still with its reddish look to it and it too, was surrounded by candles. The church was another large collection point. I loved seeing the reenactors walk around in uniform and it helped add an air to the whole scene. VERY glad we went!
Larry

Tango0118 Aug 2016 11:30 a.m. PST

A votre service mon ami!. (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Rick Don Burnette28 Aug 2016 11:38 a.m. PST

It is the micro terrain that gets you every time be it those 6 inches, the reverse slope Jacksons brigade at 1st Bull Run stood behind or the small terrain that had the Guard at Waterloo diverge or the sandy beaches of Dunkirk that some say the Panzers wouldnt negotiate
Yet most gamers dont get it and in omitting this make the history more distorted

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.