BeneathALeadMountain | 06 Jul 2016 7:15 a.m. PST |
The Warlord email newsletter thing has just dropped into my inbox with the cover art for version 2 and some plastic american airborne.
All can be found here link BALM |
BeneathALeadMountain | 06 Jul 2016 7:18 a.m. PST |
Putting an st44 on the front will only help legitimise some peoples over indulgence in them :) |
JimDuncanUK | 06 Jul 2016 7:34 a.m. PST |
They won't worry about that. |
15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 06 Jul 2016 9:37 a.m. PST |
Or encouraging the overuse of Tigers to tank-shock PBI as suggested in the cover pic's background. |
Who asked this joker | 06 Jul 2016 10:43 a.m. PST |
At the risk of sounding snarky, why is there going to be a second edition? |
BeneathALeadMountain | 06 Jul 2016 11:19 a.m. PST |
To collate the errata and (I was surprised by this) to change some of the problem areas accordingly (listing HE and armoured transports as examples). It's a fine game when played between grown ups, the only bit I have a real issue with is that pins don't count aginst you in HtH, so no suppress and charge bonus. |
Dynaman8789 | 06 Jul 2016 11:32 a.m. PST |
I'm toying with the idea of having suppression count in HTH. Roll 1d6 per shot, minus suppression, anything higher than 0 hits. I did like the change for armor so that hits that can't penetrate pins low quality crews and does nothing to high quality crews. |
Ceterman | 06 Jul 2016 12:25 p.m. PST |
BeneathALeadMountain, We always play that you have to fight with your "pins" for the 1st round. It's been a while but, say you had 4 pins when attacked. Round One: 4 pins. Round Two: cut in half so, 2 Pins. Round 3, 1 pin. It's ridiculous NOT to count pins when going H2H. Or maybe we cut them in half starting with Round one. I can't remember. All I know is that we definitely keep (some of) them in round one & then begin the half process. Peter board2deathterrain.com |
Zargon | 06 Jul 2016 2:51 p.m. PST |
Oooh! the plastic Yank paras sound good want some of those definitely |
Wargamer Blue | 06 Jul 2016 6:26 p.m. PST |
There's talk there will be a Battlefront Flames of War style upgrade if you have the 1st ed. Be interesting to see if they follow through with the talk. |
BeneathALeadMountain | 06 Jul 2016 8:04 p.m. PST |
Ceterman – that sounds much more sensible. Bolt Action is a good set of rules that just needs some slight tweaks. Had some really fun games (maybe not as tactical as CoC but really enjoyable) using the .net rules and sensible lists (from 1k up to 4k pts) and they've worked really well. BALM |
Ceterman | 07 Jul 2016 4:51 a.m. PST |
BALM, My feeling exactly. We have played CrossFire since they came out in 1997 or 98 (my favorite set of rules for any period, CF & TSATF actually) & BA does give a really enjoyable game IMHO. |