Help support TMP


"China’s new Type 093B nuclear-powered attack submarine " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 6

We're back to stump you again with three more figures!


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


2,095 hits since 28 Jun 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0128 Jun 2016 9:35 p.m. PST

"Is China's new Type 093B nuclear-powered attack submarine on par with the U.S. Navy's Improved Los Angeles-class boats?

At least some U.S. naval analysts believe so and contend that the introduction of the new People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) submarines is an indication of just how quickly Beijing is catching up to the West.

"The 93B is not to be confused with the 93. It is a transition platform between the 93 and the forthcoming 95," said Jerry Hendrix, director of the Defense Strategies and Assessments Program at the Center for a New American Security—who is also a former U.S. Navy Captain. "It is quieter and it has a new assortment of weapons to include cruise missiles and a vertical launch capability. The 93B is analogous to our LA improved in quietness and their appearance demonstrates that China is learning quickly about how to build a modern fast attack boat."…"

picture

Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

15mm and 28mm Fanatik29 Jun 2016 7:12 a.m. PST

Please insert your skepticism and comments on how China is still way behind us in the technological arms race below.

cwlinsj29 Jun 2016 7:50 a.m. PST

28mm,
Ya beat me too it!

I was thinking the same thing…

Murvihill29 Jun 2016 8:31 a.m. PST

The improved LA class dates 1982.

cwlinsj29 Jun 2016 9:06 a.m. PST

Yep, and we've been flying B-52s since 1955. They still work great, don't they?

Since the US still operates a fleet of 40 LA class as first-line attack subs, it demonstrates they are still viable weapons systems.

Lion in the Stars30 Jun 2016 2:43 a.m. PST

The LAs are retiring as Virginias come online. The last of the 688s was commissioned in 1996, and will be in service for about 35 years, so decommissioning of the last of the 688s will be in ~2031. That's 15 years from now.

I am still deeply suspicious of Chinese quality control. When the Chinese figure out quality control, they will be a major threat. Until then, they're a long way behind the curve.

They might get a good boat in spite of poor quality control, but I suspect that they're going to have a Thresher accident before then. I really hope I'm wrong, as the several minutes of utter hell before the hull collapses will make for what is among the worst ways to die.

I don't want to bury any more fellow submariners lost at sea during peacetime.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.