Help support TMP


"First Game of Napoleonics with One Hour Wargames" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Soldaten Hulmutt Jucken

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Book Review


1,727 hits since 4 Jun 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP04 Jun 2016 12:51 p.m. PST

All,

So lately I've also had a bit of paralysis by analysis, some frustration by the sheer size of the lead mountain, the veritable pile of projects started but in various stages of abandonment. This started me peering in and around the stack of unfinished business and giving serious consideration to selling off some stuff, both miniatures and rules. As I started building a pile of unused rulebooks, I came across my copy of Neil Thomas' One Hour Wargames (OHW). I threw it on the pile, took another look, then picked it back up and began thumbing through it.

After reading some reviews and then some battle reports online, I'd picked up OHW probably six months ago now. I was very interested in the concept of playing fast, ferocious battles on a small-ish table that was quick to set up and take down. If you're reading this you're probably aware I'm a big fan of campaigns; I can't even remember the last time I played a 'stand alone' game. The problem with campaigns is they're a lot of work administratively (I love filling out tables of organization with various characters and following their exploits, but it takes a lot of time to make and then keep up), and a campaign, by definition, has quite a few battles, which each take a long time to set up, play, take down, write up, post to the internet, and conduct the admin records. So I was very happy to have the rules and I very much looked forward to playing some games with OHW, fantasizing about Napoleonics, the American Revolution, and the American Civil War, in particular.

But I don't know what happened. The rule book got set aside and I kept chugging away with other games. But picking up the book from the 'rules to sell' pile, I gave it another look, then began pouring through various batreps on the internet, particularly Steven Whitesell's "Sound Officer's Call" blog, and this motivated me to give the rules another look and to actually get them on the table. Now, I'm a constant tinkerer, for better or worse never playing a set of rules as written. And these were no different: I like them, but I wanted a bit more randomization in the activation process, and I wanted a bit more period flavor for Napoleonics. So I sketched some changes out (the changes are at the bottom of this post), set out the forces and the table, grabbed the boy, and we got down to the business of liberating Europe from Bonaparte/fighting to keep the Revolution alive.

And so General Dadie and General Nickolls led their troops onto the field of battle. The setting is somewhere in Europe, with me commanding the French and the boy commanding the British-led Allies in a fictional campaign in maybe 1813 or so. I say 1813 or so because I want to be able to bring some Bavarians, Saxons, Italians, and Poles onto the field of battle, and he can bring some Dutch, Prussians, Austrians, and Russians, if we see fit. Our first game was purely French vs British; maybe it will stay that way, maybe not. That's the beauty of fictional campaigns ;)

picture

The opposing forces, with Brits on bottom and French on top. The figures are 10mm plastic figures from the boardgame 'Risk,' some of which were painted up by me, but the vast majority came from 'Gunner' of Le Petite Armee. The command stands represent the Commanding General and his staff, while 'regular' stands represent brigades of infantry and cavalry, and artillery grand batteries. As usual, when you play at this level of abstraction it causes some… inconsistencies. But nothing the boy and I can't get past, and hopefully you can too. The OHW rules are abstract enough to not make a declaration of what each unit represents, I simply chose brigade-level stands as it made sense to me and fit what I wanted to do. But in the OHW rules there are units of skirmishers, for example, which would be equivalent to Rifles, Jaegers, Grenzers, Light Infantry, Legere, etc…, and it's kinda weird to have whole brigades of these running around the table as formed units. But we're doing it, and it works ;)

Also, I use some high profile units in the game, such as the French "Old Guard," but it's simply for fun and identification of the units, they have no special power in the rules, they are simply treated as any other infantry brigade.

In any case, the forces are as follows, from left to right, top to bottom:

French commander, General Dadie, the Old Guard (infantry), the 1st Ligne (infantry), the 2nd Ligne (infantry), the 1st Legere (skirmishers), the Young Guard (skirmishers), and a (grand) battery of Horse Artillery (again, forgive the abstraction, but I wanted to differentiate Foot and Horse artillery).

British commander, General Nickolls, the British Foot Guards (infantry), the 1st Brigade of Foot (infantry), the Highlander Brigade, the Rifle Brigade (95th and 60th brigaded together?) (skirmishers), the Union Brigade (Scots Greys and Blues) (cavalry), and a Dragoon Brigade (cavalry).

*Yes, I know I'm using regimental-style names for most of the brigades, but please cut me some slack, I don't feel like using names of commanders I haven't written up yet.

I put the type of unit in parentheses as OHW break down units into four distinct categories: infantry, skirmishers, artillery, and cavalry, and I wanted you to know how each unit was designated (i.e., my designating the Young Guard as skirmishers rather than infantry). Force composition is pretty cool and simple in OHW, you just consult a chart, roll a single D6, and it tells you how many of each unit type you get for the upcoming battle. Additionally, there is a battery of 30 different scenarios in the book, which you can also simply roll up with a D6 to decide which you're going to use. As this was our first go round we went with the very straight forward scenario one, which is a simple 'line up and go whack the other guy' type of fight.

picture

The boy General makes his move: he moved his General to support the British Foot Guards (bottom center), keeping me from forming square, while he pushed both brigades of cavalry into the center (center right), threatening the 2nd Ligne (center top), the Legere (center left), and my grand battery atop the hill (top center), all at once. Furthermore, it made clear my mistake in moving my reserve (the Old Guard, far left) away from the hill to reinforce the right flank prematurely…

To see how the fight turned out, please check the blog at:
link

Wow, what a @#$% fight!!! Yes, the rules are simple, but they were quick (that was our very first game and took about an hour and a half, with me having to looks stuff up and explain it to a six year-old) and super tense. We really had a great time and look forward to playing it again; as a matter of fact, the table is set, ready to go, and we'll look to head upstairs either today or tomorrow to have another go.

I hope you guys like this batrep as much as we enjoyed playing it.

V/R,
Jack

PzGeneral04 Jun 2016 2:36 p.m. PST

Congratulations on your fight and report. And for getting your 6 year old to not mangle up 10mm figures! thumbs up

Nice report, I've played these rules, but with Ancients and Franco-Prussian figures. Nice set of rules for a quick outing….keep up the good work!

Dave

Gonsalvo04 Jun 2016 7:29 p.m. PST

Enjoyed the report and your suggested modifications. It would seem easy to add green/militia and Elite troops buy simply having them use D4's and D8's respectively. But that may be more than you want to tackle. Could also adjust the rating of the units nfor the next battle based on how they did in the last, if you continue with your campaign theme.

normsmith05 Jun 2016 2:22 a.m. PST

Thanks, enjoyed that. Visually a very helpful idea to show the direction of artillery fire with the orange marker.

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP05 Jun 2016 7:04 a.m. PST

PzGen – Thanks, and I'm quite proud of the boy picking up the rules and taking good care of the troops!

Gonsalvo – Thank you, and absolutely, the game is eminently modifiable. As you saw, I've already done some, but I'm hesitant to go too far and have it lose it's 'One Hour' appeal. But at some point I'm definitely going to have to start differentiating between Militia and Guard, and I love the idea of troops getting better/worse on campaign.

Norm – I appreciate it, and that orange marker has proved useful in numerous games now.

V/R,
Jack

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.