Niall Barr writes that the AP ammunition supplied for the American 75mm in the M3 and M4 was poor, shattering against German armour. The solution was apparently to take captured German 75mm ammo and use it to "cap" the US rounds. It fitted the US gun and the hybrid round was then much more effective, although most of the accumulated stock was lost in Tobruk.
I'd never heard this before, and don't quite follow it in several aspects. When a shell fails to defeat armour it's going as I understand it to do any of four things: bounce off, bury itself in the armour, make a gouge or tunnel in the armour from which it exits back to the open air, or break up. If the round couldn't defeat the armour, you'd expect one or more of those to eventuate. Is the implication here that the US round smashed on impact with armour that it should on paper have defeated?
I assume it just wasn't very good, otherwise there'd have been a Great American Shell Scandal and I've not read of one. I don't get, though, why an AP round would shatter, rather than bounce off. I've heard of squeeze-bore and sub-calibre rounds doing so, because they were travelling abnormally fast. So you had to use tungsten rather than steel for the head. But the US 75mm isn't a high velocity weapon.
On the mechanics of the adaptation, was the "cap" the entire business end of the shell, detached from a German round to leave a filled, headless shell case, and fitted to the shell case of a similarly de-headed US one? Or was there some piece at the tip of the shell that was removed from the German shell and fitted to the US one?
Was there a single common German AP round for 75mm, or were there different types for the L/24 versus the L/43 and L/48 weapons?
And finally, does anyone think this worth including into playing rules? Most that I have ever used abstract this level of detail away, i.e. it is embedded already into the effectiveness accorded the US 75mm.
Opinions gratefully read!