"U.S. Congress Tells The Pentagon To Not Retire ..." Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Showcase ArticleWho has armed the snowmen, and to whom does their allegiance belong?
Featured Workbench ArticleIf you want to magnetically store your 15mm vehicles, then you'd better add some steel!
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
Tango01 | 30 Apr 2016 8:56 p.m. PST |
…The A-10 Fleet. "The U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II AKA "Warthog" has become one of the most-recognized and beloved warplanes since it started flying in the 1970s. We've been hearing about its impending retirement—and the reason many in the armed services community are against that—for ages, but proposed legislation could keep it in the sky for at least a little longer. This week House Armed Services Committee (HASC) Chairman Rep. Mac Thornberry submitted his latest version of the defense policy bill that would dictate how military money would be spent. Subtitle D, Section 142 of H.R. 1735 basically says the Air Force would not be able to use any fiscal year 2017 funds "to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft." The bill also requires the USAF to keep at least 171 A-10s as "primary mission aircraft inventory;" in other words, ready to rock and roll…" Full article here link Good news! Amicalement Armand |
Tango01 | 01 May 2016 3:23 p.m. PST |
Agree!… (smile) Amicalement Armand |
|