Help support TMP


"Russians Barrel Roll Another US Plane" Topic


18 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 7

These four are easily identified!


Featured Profile Article

Whence the Deep Ones?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian speculates about post-Innsmouth gaming.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,088 hits since 29 Apr 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

cwlinsj29 Apr 2016 5:35 p.m. PST

Russian jet barrel rolls another US plane over intl. airspace in the Baltics.

link

I wonder what would happen if the American pilot pops all his flares and chaff right when the Russian jet does the flyover. Sucking several flares into the intakes can't be fun.

Redroom29 Apr 2016 5:51 p.m. PST

No one will call them on their "antics", it will be sad when pilots start dying because of someone showing off.

Winston Smith29 Apr 2016 6:05 p.m. PST

I wonder how Putin would react to the same.
Just an idle thought…..

darthfozzywig29 Apr 2016 7:23 p.m. PST

Maybe they were just keeping up foreign relations.

picture

Choctaw29 Apr 2016 8:13 p.m. PST

The reporter looked like someone off a bad SNL skit.

Mako1130 Apr 2016 1:21 p.m. PST

Well, the Turks shot one down and the incursions ceased, so………

Sundance30 Apr 2016 4:02 p.m. PST

Yeah, next time they do that, we need to shoot the mofo down and tell the Russkies we have no idea what happened. The guy just pulled his maneuver, lost control and augured in.

IGWARG1 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian30 Apr 2016 4:13 p.m. PST

So, American spy airplane came within 100 feet of Russian plane performing manuevres.

Russians probably were making their version of "Top Gun".

Somebody probably lost a bet.

Charlie 1230 Apr 2016 7:06 p.m. PST

And another pilot gets street cred in the ready room. Move along, folks. Nothing new here…..

Barin101 May 2016 2:19 a.m. PST

I remember how Russian bombers were criticized for having their trasnponders off while flying near European countries.
This is the same case here – RC-135 had its transponder off on "routinely" spying mission.
As I wrote earlier, I still think that there might be a more polite ways of showing the plane off, but we don't now, what is a % between these "routine missions" going as intended, and those, met by barrel rolling.

Jemima Fawr01 May 2016 8:48 a.m. PST

Barin,

Your countrymen were deliberately flying through civil controlled airspace, with transponders off and deliberately changing altitude to cause maximum disruption in some of the most congested civil airspace in the world.

Barin102 May 2016 5:25 a.m. PST

Well, you're talking about an incident near UK, but it is easy to find how many times it was complained that Russian military planes are in the international airspace with their transponders off – also on Baltic sea, where we had RC flying.
What I haven't seen translated into English are the comments of our MOD on latest RC accident.
What was said, that all the time RC's were on its routine flight that somehow taking them as close to Kaliningrad military infrastructure as possible,but staying in international airspace, these spy planes have their transponders off.
And while we're here, 2 US spy planes were intercepted near Kamchatka only in April.

link

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP02 May 2016 12:57 p.m. PST

All part of "the game" …

Jemima Fawr02 May 2016 1:53 p.m. PST

Barin,

Not from me.

Only the ignorant complain about such things, as there's nothing wrong with being in international, uncontrolled airspace with transponders off. Routine, Russian penetrations of the UK ADIZ are not normally a problem at all, despite the screaming gutter press. They're always intercepted by UK QRA in a safe and professional manner with no potential for accidents or misunderstandings re intent.

The key words being 'safe' and 'professional'. Compare and contrast.

If you don't like people being near your airspace, perhaps your barely-trained aircrew should stay away from ours, eh?

Lion in the Stars02 May 2016 2:13 p.m. PST

I wonder what would happen if the American pilot pops all his flares and chaff right when the Russian jet does the flyover. Sucking several flares into the intakes can't be fun.

The technical term for that is FOD, and the end result is about like United 1549 landing in the Hudson: Engines no worky, time to impersonate a lawn dart.

See also the tail end of the movie Firefox, the Rear Defense Pod is the chaff/flare launcher.

You do not want to know what a single 3/8" bolt will do to a turbine.

cwlinsj02 May 2016 2:40 p.m. PST

I figured as much. Since the flares are between 5-8" long and burn at about 2,000 degrees F., I suspect they would do some reconfiguring to engines.

Since they are considered countermeasures, it wouldn't even be an aggressive act.

Lion in the Stars02 May 2016 7:50 p.m. PST

Worse, the engine would break up the flare into small pieces and feed it high-pressure air, probably causing an explosion. (difference between 5lbs of solid log or 5lbs of sawdust)

This is in addition to all the damage eating an 8" long piece of metal would do to an engine in the first place.

EnemyAce02 May 2016 8:54 p.m. PST

Eh, next time just say that the CIWS was 'live' as part of a routine training mission. Just bad luck the pilot chose that time to 'buzz' the ship…

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.