Help support TMP


"AAR - Seven Pines" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Top-Rated Ruleset

Volley & Bayonet


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


1,401 hits since 23 Apr 2016
©1994-2020 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2016 1:49 p.m. PST

Howdy,

I ran a playtest of my Seven Pines scenario twice at Lexicon over the weekend. Game played using Volley & Bayonet with 15mm figures. I used "linear bases" rather than square, just cause I thought it looked better.

On Friday,

Hill's Division through itself upon the southern end of the Union IV Corps along the Richmond-Williamsburg Road. The attack exhausted Hill's Division, but also exhausted Casey's Division. Hooker's Division from III Corps moved up to support Keyes' IV Corps, as Longstreet arrived to carry on with Hill's attack. Longstreet scattered Casey, routing Naglee and Palmer's brigades. Hooker formed his line to contain the breakthrough, with Kearny arriving to balence local strength.

Meanwhile, on the northern flank Whiting began his attack on Couch's Division, just as Sedgwick's Division crossed the grapevine bridge to reinforce.

Huger entered the table, in the south, on the last turn of the game, but his presence on the battlefield did not affect the outcome.

In the end, both sides had a division exhausted, none collapsed. Total losses (before regrouping 22 Federal SP, 15 Confederate. So casualties 5,500 Federal, 4,000 Confederates. Strength engaged Federal: 15 brigades, 78 SP, so 39,000 vs. Strength engaged Confederate: 16 brigades, 66 SP, so 33,000 (not counting Huger). It was an engaging and suspenseful game, much fun. Local successes stymied by the arrival of reinforcements.

Photos:


Terrain, view from NE (also initial deployments):


Hill's attack:


Hooker forms line, Longstreet attacking:

Whiting begins attack:

Evening situation:


Ponder on,

JAS

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2016 2:07 p.m. PST

Howdy,

In the Saturday battle, Hill's initial attack was more restrained. The decisive action was in the north, Whiting attacked into deluge of Federal fire (sizzling hot dice, 7 hits from three brigades on a single turn). Whiting's division exhausted, collapsed. Casey's Division also exhausted. Huger did not even get on the table in this one.

Confederate losses: 40 SP, Union: 16 SP, so casualties 10,000 Confederates dead, wounded, or captured, vs. 4,000 for the Union. A much bloodier battle, yet still a near run thing with Couch and Kearny's divisions near exhaustion.

Ponder on,


JAS

Dan 05524 Apr 2016 8:49 p.m. PST

Great pictures, nice after action report.

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2016 4:45 a.m. PST

Thank you, they were fun games.

JAS

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2016 6:13 a.m. PST

Howdy,

The Scenario Map:

Ponder on,


JAS

tommyb2985 Supporting Member of TMP29 Apr 2016 4:42 a.m. PST

JAS,

Very nice.
What size bases did you use for your 15s?

Tom

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP29 Apr 2016 4:59 a.m. PST

Howdy,

I sabot F&F bases (1-inch width) onto the V&B bases with rubber cement.

The bases shown in the pictures are actually 4x2 inches, rather than 3x1.5 inches. With V&B consistency within the game is more important than slavish devotion. One reason I like V&B so well, is the flexibility. Yes, I know I'm a heretic.

My 7YW figures are 6mm on 2x1 inch bases.

Ponder on,


JAS

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP29 Apr 2016 6:09 a.m. PST

From the Confederate player after Saturday's game:

"The south could have won if it hadn't been for those lousy dices!"

tommyb2985 Supporting Member of TMP30 Apr 2016 10:17 p.m. PST

I agree that the linear formation looks better.
I'm going to give it a try.

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP01 May 2016 9:56 a.m. PST

Howdy,

I still treat them as mass stands in regard to strength and dice.

Also, I'm careful so dismounted cavalry look different than infantry, as the dismounts (light horse rule) are a linear stand for strength and dice. Not an issue for Seven Pines, but will be in other early war ACW scenarios.

Ponder on,


JAS

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.