"The English Oak at 1/72 scale - how?" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Scale Message Board Back to the Terrain and Scenics Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleContinuing our 'animals' theme, Stronty Girl tackles a pair of lionesses.
Current Poll
|
HidaSeku | 24 Mar 2016 2:12 p.m. PST |
I was looking into getting some trees that were on the area of WWII Eastern Front and getting accurately scaled models for use in my wargaming. First, I looked into which trees are most common in the area. As a completely ignorant person on the subject of trees, I went and looked at a few places and came up with the English Oak being very common in some of the areas I like to wargame, near the Don River area. I looked up the size of the English Oak, and found a common height of between 20m and 40m. At first I thought, no big deal. However, I then did the calculation of 1/72 and realized I would need trees that were 27cm to 55cm in height to be in scale! That's enormous! Especially considering the ground scale rarely matches the miniature scale at 1/72, I'm not sure how I should proceed. So, for those that game in 1/72 (or perhaps its evil twin, 1/76 or generic "20mm"), what size trees should I really aim for? I'm thinking an exact scale match would simply be too large to be practical, but then again 6" tall trees would be anywhere from 1/2 to 1/4 the actual height they should be. Help? O_o |
Mark Plant | 24 Mar 2016 2:57 p.m. PST |
but then again 6" tall trees would be anywhere from 1/2 to 1/4 the actual height they should be. I presume you are going to have hills. And are those hills going to be in "correct" vertical scale? Because they will need to be a couple of metres tall, minimum. You simply cannot match vertical scale. Everything we do is a representation, from "units" represented by a few figures, through discrete time "moves" instead of the real flow of time, and three houses representing a village. Use the smallest trees that don't look ridiculous. For 15mm I have ones that are only 3" tall. No-one cares. |
Saber6 | 25 Mar 2016 6:54 a.m. PST |
Woodland Scenic has a tree/scale chart to help. I use the 2-3 inch with my 15s. Scale says these are @ 20-40 feet tall |
Peithetairos | 31 Mar 2016 6:19 p.m. PST |
I wrote a tutorial how to make oaks for 15 and 28mm. I think thye will also match 1/72. It is true that you won't be able to depict an oak true to scale, but if it looks right, I don't see a big problem with this. link
|
HidaSeku | 01 Apr 2016 9:45 a.m. PST |
Peithetairos, that is a great tutorial! I'm not sure if I'm up for such a challenge (as it looks quite intimidating) but I'm glad you shared it, for sure! I guess I will have to "accept" having trees that are smaller than "in scale" trees would be. Makes sense. |
uglyfatbloke | 09 Apr 2016 9:54 a.m. PST |
We find that even with 54mm figures trees 6 inches tall are plenty big enough – though it does help if you avoid putting them right next to buildings. |
|