"Any reference material on the katzbalger?" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
Featured Profile ArticleIf you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Druzhina | 16 Feb 2016 2:30 a.m. PST |
|
Puster | 16 Feb 2016 8:39 a.m. PST |
The picture of the battle near Nürnberg 1502 brought to our attention recently by Daniel also includes some clear pictures of sidearms that do look like Katzbalger.
The depiction of Schoenberg 1504 is less clear, though some of the German infantry seem to have Katzbalger.
Afaik there are no other (?) depictions of Landsknechts in their early stage, between 1487 and the Swabian war, when they seem to have used these as standard. |
Druzhina | 16 Feb 2016 9:13 p.m. PST |
|
Puster | 17 Feb 2016 3:17 p.m. PST |
Indeed. But the very title – 1500-1540 – already makes clear that earlier depictions of Landsknechts are rare to non-existant. When they do show up, the Landsknechts already wear that distinctive sword, though in some (few) of it early forms (before 1510) it looks to me like they are slightly different forms (more open handguard, slightly longer). At one point she mentions one work on arms that claims Katzbalger were only introduced in 1520, but at the same time dismisses this as Katzbalger are clearly shown on many earlier depictions. There is, however, no part on the previous history of this swordtype in this work. |
Druzhina | 17 Feb 2016 7:43 p.m. PST |
|
|