Help support TMP

"Top 5 Requirements for a Good Tournament Ruleset" Topic

5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Game Design Message Board

Back to the Tournaments Message Board

Action Log

28 May 2016 2:49 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
  • Crossposted to Game Design board

480 hits since 14 Dec 2015
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian14 Dec 2015 5:54 p.m. PST

What qualities do you feel are essential for a ruleset that adapts well to tournament play?

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP14 Dec 2015 6:02 p.m. PST

It's point system should actually function as a system that gives a "poor" army a fighting chance. It should make the most effective troops very expensive.

One problem I always had with WRG ancients rules was that all weapons cost the same, regardless of their efficiency.

peterx Supporting Member of TMP14 Dec 2015 6:55 p.m. PST

Very clear writing and clarity of the rules. Then, all players (or a referee if needed) can resolve disagreements about rules interpretation.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP14 Dec 2015 7:05 p.m. PST

Simple mechanics with a minimum of ambiguity. If there are multiple legal styles of play for a game, it will tend to leave some players (slightly) alienated. In a tourney, you don't want to waste up to two games getting adjusted to the game if others aren't.

While I would want the mechanics to be simple and stable, there should be a lot of operational latitude so you can get a lot of flavor and variety from the different opponents.

Beyond that, I think it's all in the scenario design and playtesting. That said, as Winston Smith point out above, an equitable (as possible) point system makes that design double plus non-difficult. Also, consistency in the state space of the stats tends to make the scenario design more stable, making it easier to build a scenario that will fit reasonably well into a time constraint.

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP14 Dec 2015 7:39 p.m. PST

Minimum of ambiguity….
Well, that eliminates WRG…..

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.