Help support TMP


"Why U.S. Air Force F-15s Can't Defend Turkey from Russia" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Hills for the Fulda Gap

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian decides on hills for his Team Yankee project.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting More of the Corporate Babes

Warcolours Painting Studio Fezian says he's pretty happy with these babes...


1,154 hits since 8 Dec 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0108 Dec 2015 1:08 p.m. PST

"U.S. Air Force F-15C Eagles operating out of Turkey's Incirlik air force base are not cleared to defend Ankara's airspace even if confronted by Russian or Syrian warplanes. The Boeing-built air superiority fighters were originally deployed to the NATO base—which is relatively close to the Syrian border in Adana—because of increased Russian air activity near the border.

As one senior U.S. Air Force official explained, the service deployed six F-15C Eagle air superiority fighters and six F-15E Strike Eagle strike fighters to the Incirlik air base in November. While the Strike Eagles were tasked to hit Daesh targets in northern Syria, the F-15Cs were sent to stiffen Turkish air defenses against Russian encroachments.

The C's were sent to support Turkey when we believed Russia was increasing their border crossing violations," the senior Air Force official said. "They were never cleared to defend Turkey or work in an air defense role and then the Turks shot that Su-24."…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

David Manley08 Dec 2015 1:35 p.m. PST

It's not as if they were needed

Mako1108 Dec 2015 6:10 p.m. PST

I certainly hope they are at least armed for self defense.

paulgenna09 Dec 2015 6:48 a.m. PST

I'm sure they can defend themselves if needed but if Russia attacked, they might ignore any US forces with the hope of not drawing us in.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse09 Dec 2015 7:53 a.m. PST

Why ? Besides the Turks have a big air force. You don't want to detract from the main effort of the elimination of Daesh and it's allies/supporters. Plus … No one wants WWIII, save for Daesh …

USAFpilot10 Dec 2015 12:29 p.m. PST

The USAF should not be used to defend Turkey. Furthermore Turkey should be expelled from NATO.

desert war28 Dec 2015 11:46 a.m. PST

USAFpilot

The only reason Turkey is part of Nato is because they have the capability of closing the Black Sea off from the Med. If the cold war would have gone hot that strip of land would have been very valuable as it was in both world wars.

If Turkey is booted from NATO and Russia takes that strait then the Med becomes a Russian Lake.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.