Help support TMP


"Comparison review Revell and Dragon Tiger I, 1/72 scale" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Land Gallery Message Board

Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board

Back to the 20mm WWII Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

WWII Combined Arms


Rating: gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


2,027 hits since 21 Nov 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

LeonAdler Sponsoring Member of TMP21 Nov 2015 2:30 p.m. PST

The Dragon Gruppe Fehrmann Tiger kit was the first 1/72 model I bought in a very long time. A spontaneous purchase in my now gone model shop. Its a Dragon kit and a Tiger I thought what better way to start back into 1/72 scale.
Having made a number of Dragon 1/35th scale kits I opened up the box with some anticipation. Very nice it was, odd certainly as its a sort of cobbled together mid/late Tiger for a special unit in the Ruhr pocket ( as memory allows).

picture

First problem is a rather fundamental one. All the pictures of the actual vehicles
show them having zimeritt, the kit is non zimeritt. Then there's the rear idler wheel that is molded so as to sit to far ‘out' and throws the tracks out of alignment. Then the tracks, never liked rubber tracks much but these are beautifully molded and with a bit of work you can get the sag etc.
picture

Only problem is the tracks are too long. Too short fairly easily sorted, too long a pain in the rear.Metal tow cables are included, absolutely terrible. The twist of the wire nowhere near tight enough to be right and the wire itself so springy as to be a nightmare to fit. Replaced with the lovely EUREKA ones.
picture

Then there is the exhaust baffles. Someone at Dragon HQ thought it would be a great idea to have these cast in pretty thick brass. Must be someone who never makes models I'd suggest. Looks very nice but if like me you like to do a bit of battle damage to a model is almost impossible to cut, bend or anything else the brass is so tough.
Otherwise its a nice enough kit but the problems above rather make the £14.95 GBP I spent seem a heck of a lot.

Now to a kit I bought after a bit more research, the Dragon Tiger I E with Zimmerrt. Wanted this for my Normandy Tiger unit and thought as it was a later release it wouldn't have the problems of the Gruppe Fehrmann one. Oh you mad optimist!
Lovely kit in the box, beautifully rendered Zimmerrt and really sharp moulding.
Then the same problems as above, idler same defect requiring major surgery, tracks too long, exhaust baffles made from left over battleship Armour plate, grim tow cables. In addition whereas the Fehrmann kit had separate tools this kit has them molded on and not that sharply either.

picture

The to cap it I was hoping for an open option for the hatches, the Fehrmann had the commanders and loaders hatches separate. In this kit just the commanders hatch! Never sure why kit makers do this. Takes virtually no more work or cost to produce open hatches as an option. So major surgery needed to get that on the kit.
picture

I have a second Zimmerrt Tiger but this time I've bought some OKB tracks which look fantastic.
picture

picture

Now on to the Revell Tiger I offering, going to be a lot shorter review on this one.
Its a great kit. The tracks are of the ‘section' type which looks a bit intimidating at first but after a few dry runs are a doddle. One tip tempting though it is to paint the tracks and wheels before assembly this deos mean you have to resort to superglue. Better in my opinion to paint the lower hull and wheels serperatly, then assemble the wheels, Then you can scrape the paint off the wheels where they will connect with the tracks. Painting the tracks in situ is pretty easy.

picture

These are brilliant kits.
picture

The only problem for me was that I wanted zimmerit for my Normandy Tigers.

You can get an etched kit to add this I just did it with milliput and a tool as I out-
lined a while ago with some Panthers. If you do this just remember to drill through
the holes for the exhaust manifolds, track cables and mudguards.

picture

Nothing else to say really, out of the box these kits make a great Tiger.
picture

Comparison shots of the Revell and Dragon Tigers
picture

picture


All models airbrushed over a base coat of PSC dunklegelb using an Iwat plus B
using Life colour paints. Then gloss varnished, decaled , various washes, oil based,
Humbrol and first outing for the MIG ones ( and very nice they are too).

Various artists pastels/wax pencils used for wear and tear. Then matt varnished.

Simple as that really, both makes a joy to paint.

Fred Cartwright21 Nov 2015 3:36 p.m. PST

£15.00 GBP for a 1/72 Tiger! That's pricey! Particularly when you spent extra to correct faults. That's getting pretty close to the cost of 1/56 versions.

LeonAdler Sponsoring Member of TMP21 Nov 2015 3:42 p.m. PST

Indeed Fred Cartwright, for that kind of money you don't expect to have to be correcting basic faults do you?
The Revell ones can be got for a tenner or less.
Any one tried the Zvezda one?
Problem with 28mm stuff that Ive seen is that they just don't look right and never quite understood the idea of increasing the footprint of units ( and the cost) for no apparent reason. Always seemed a more of a marketing move than anything else to me but then again I'm an old cynic lol
L

Gunner Dunbar21 Nov 2015 8:07 p.m. PST

Great looking models, I have made both kits, I am a Revel fan to, good review.

Asteroid X21 Nov 2015 11:06 p.m. PST

Thank you for the reviews!

There are some more of these and different makes here:

scalemates.com/products/reviews.php?scale=1%3A72&topic=Panzerkampfwagen+VI+Tiger+I

Fred Cartwright22 Nov 2015 5:16 a.m. PST

The Rubicon 1/56 Tiger is very nice and you can do early, mid or late versions out of the box. I use 28mm (and 15mm) because I game other periods in those sizes and have all the scenery, particularly things like buildings and fortifications. Getting more scenery just for WW2 didn't seem to make sense.
The other thing about 20mm I don't like is the wide variation in size. Airfix plastics compared to Revell or SHQ metals vs Raventhorpe for example. In 15mm I mix Peter Pig, FoW, Essex, QRF and Skyrrex and in 28mm Foundry, Warlord, Black Tree, TAG and Perry's without problems. The main advantage of 20mm used to be cheap plastic kits, but with the likes of PSC entering the market things are changing. 4 Tiger I's for £20.00 GBP comes out a lot cheaper than even the Revell kits.
Very nicely done models though and an interesting choice of unit.

LeonAdler Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Nov 2015 9:12 a.m. PST

£20.00 GBP for a vehicle? Good grief!
Well most of the variation is the difference between 1/72 and 1/76 which as they are they different scales is fair enough.
Certainly I couldn't mix say Warlords and Perry's as they seem to be two entirely different scales as well. Not quite sure how the variations in 28mm came about given that 28mm is a newly invented scale. Then again using 20mm, 15, 28mm etc rather than ratio scales always makes life tricky. As if we didnt all have enough complications to deal with as it is lol
L

Fred Cartwright22 Nov 2015 11:25 a.m. PST

You don't need as many Tigers in 1/56. Or were you referring to the 15mm PSC ones? That's £20.00 GBP for 4. So about half the price of 20mm. I happily use Perry and Warlord together. The Perry figures are a little shorter and less chunky than Warlord, but the equipment and weapons match so it doesn't bother me. There are people shorter and less chunky than me. That's real life for you!
Unfortunately there are no scale plans for humans, which makes doing a 1/76 version tricky. It is the weapons and equipment that can be scaled as they didn't issue you with a bigger Bren gun just because you were 6' 5" and built like a brick s**t house.

LeonAdler Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Nov 2015 11:57 a.m. PST

Very true lol
Though amazing how many times the smallest fella in a squad ends up carrying more than his share of ammo lol
L

donlowry22 Nov 2015 2:28 p.m. PST

In your comparison shot of all 3: Which 1 is which?

LeonAdler Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Nov 2015 2:42 p.m. PST

First shot, Revell, Dragon with zim and the Fehrmann second shot Fehrmann , Dragon with zim and Revell. In the pic with just two those are both Revell ones. Should have captioned them better.
L

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.