Help support TMP


"Bring on the Knighthawk?" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Action Log

20 Apr 2016 11:11 a.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tractics


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:300 Scale US Modern Tanks & Mortar Carriers

Twenty-five years? It seems like just yesterday to

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian...


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,204 hits since 26 Oct 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian26 Oct 2015 6:56 p.m. PST

The Osprey, due to its rotor wash, is ill suited for rope-suspension insertions.

The MH-60S Knighthawk, which is currently a vertical replenishment specialist, now has the capability to be upgraded to a combatant helicopter. With changes in training and organization, the Knighthawk could be a useful supplement to the Osprey in naval service.

Should the US Navy make greater use of its Knighthawks?

Lion in the Stars27 Oct 2015 2:54 p.m. PST

USN doesn't really have a lot of fast-ropers. Marines use either Ospreys or Ch53s.

Though I'm sure that the USN will use the Knighthawks for every possible role.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.