"1672- Other manufacturers in 28mm?" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board
Action Log
14 Oct 2015 8:36 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "1672- Other manafcturers in 28mm?" to "1672- Other manufacturers in 28mm?"
Areas of InterestRenaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
| Field Marshal | 14 Oct 2015 5:47 p.m. PST |
Don't know but my last post got eaten?
Apart from the North Star 1672 does anyone else do suitable figures to add to generals etc in 28mm? |
| idontbelieveit | 14 Oct 2015 8:26 p.m. PST |
They are a little bit earlier in time, but if you are looking for just general types you could look at TAG TYW figs. I think they are a good size match. I also used some bicorne horse for cuirassiers and they fit right in, so there might be something there. League of Augsburg makes figures that are slightly later – I think they are smaller, but you'd have to confirm that. |
| yarr68 | 15 Oct 2015 5:24 a.m. PST |
I can't think of anyone who specifically makes figures for 1672. But you could very easily get away with figures from Front Rank, link
LOA as above, link
Reiver, link
Dixons link
and Essex, link |
| redmist1122 | 15 Oct 2015 7:33 a.m. PST |
Wargames Foundry used to have some good sets that matched pretty much everybody's size except Front Rank. Took a quick peek at their site, and it appeared they are no longer listed…weird. Good luck! P. |
| Brownbear | 15 Oct 2015 11:59 a.m. PST |
they are still in their marlburian range; the informal tricorne ones |
| Rampjaar | 06 Nov 2015 3:30 a.m. PST |
North Star took over Marc Copplestone's 1672 range and expanded them. I haven't seen tricornes as early as 1672 yet though, so you should be careful using those figures. |
|
