Help support TMP


"Early Saxon double/layered tunics?" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Dark Ages Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Spearmen

PhilGreg Painters in Sri Lanka paints our Teutonic spearmen.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Some Lady Pirates

Adam loves Scorched Brown...


Featured Book Review


840 hits since 28 Aug 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

CATenWolde28 Aug 2015 2:15 p.m. PST

Hi,

I'm painting up a batch of Splintered Light 15mm early Saxons, and the unarmored warriors all appear to be wearing double tunics: the longer sleeves of an under-tunic are depicted along with a short-sleeve over-tunic.

The vast majority of information I can find indicates that they would have normally been wearing a single, long-sleeve tunic, or at least that any under-tunic would have been covered by the long-sleeve over-tunic.

Is there any opinion on this one way or the other? The mid-arm sleeve breaks are pretty defined, so I could either paint double-tunics, paint bare arms with short-sleeved tunics, or do some file work and try to just paint long-sleeved tunics (or some combination of the above).

Thanks for any advice!

Cheers,

Christopher

pigasuspig28 Aug 2015 5:46 p.m. PST

This isn't historical advice, but I have a bunch of 10mm spearmen I just repainted with the same kind of sculpt. Originally I treated it as a single long-sleeve tunic. But I didn't like how it came out, and in the repaint went with two tunics in different colors. I like the latter look much better.

Cerdic29 Aug 2015 6:50 a.m. PST

Paint them so it looks good to you. If in doubt just go for the old "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" excuse…

GurKhan29 Aug 2015 10:43 a.m. PST

Wikipedia link does say "The tunic … had either long or short sleeves", but I haven't seen any other evidence for short sleeves that I can recall. But to be fair, we don't have all that much evidence for the early period, before we start getting much in the way of art and literature as sources; and there is the occasional short-sleeved earlier German tunic on sources like the Marcus Aurelius column, which could be ancestral to early Anglo-Saxon styles. So personally I'd paint them as is.

CATenWolde30 Aug 2015 7:36 a.m. PST

Thanks for all the advice. Now that I take a second look at the figures, one arm will eventually be covered with a shield, and the other is sometimes covered by a cloak, so the issue isn't as important as I first thought. I'll experiment with long sleeves and double-tunics and see what looks best per pose.

Cheers,

Christopher

Stew art Supporting Member of TMP01 Sep 2015 7:53 a.m. PST

yeah, i always just paint them with long sleeves underneath the short sleeves. no ones ever said anything and it looks good.

but if somone ever did comment i'd just say they were from Seattle and the dark ages were known for being grundge. : )

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.