Help support TMP


"1/600 Ancient Galley, Comparison?" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Galleys Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Phalangites

More figures for the 28mm Amazon army!


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


2,874 hits since 19 Aug 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP19 Aug 2015 1:34 p.m. PST

I'm starting to gear up to do Roman Seas at 1/600 scale.

Printed out the pdf files for their 1/300 Roman and Carthaginian ships at 50%. They look very pretty!

Ordered a sampling of Skytrex metal models of the types Xyston doesn't make. (A clubmate has a stash of the Xystons buried somewhere, but not found yet, further archaeology will ensue.)

The Skytrex models are tiny compared to the Roman Seas at 1/600. Fortunately a number of them will still work out. The Skytrex Penteconter looks about right. The Large Merchant Ship would match for a Small. The Quadremes match for Biremes. The Sextireme is too short as is to use as a Trireme, but 3 of them could be spliced to make 2 Triremes that match.

I like the size of the 1/600 paper models and don't want to reduce them further.

I'm curious how the Xyston compare. Does anyone have photos showing them with Skytrex and/or Roman Seas models reduced 50% to 1/600?

Personal logo Virtualscratchbuilder Supporting Member of TMP Fezian20 Aug 2015 4:20 p.m. PST

Here is a comparison of a 1/300 five printed out at 50% (nominal 1/600) compared to the same ship in 1/600 from Xyston. As you can see there is considerable difference – so much so that I am rethinking my strategy. The Xyston ships are smaller than I thought they would be and a little disappointing, and I am not sure I want to work any smaller in paper.


picture

picture

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP20 Aug 2015 7:34 p.m. PST

Thanks! That looks about the way the Skytrex compares too. I haven't built my 50% reduced paper models yet, have just compared them to the flat deck pieces. I also don't want to reduce them further.

However, I think they still combine well, just using any metal ships in the mix as smaller ratings than as-sold. The Skytrex Quadremes certainly match up well enough against the paper biremes, etc. as I mentioned in the first post. Looks like the same deal goes for Xyston.

Any tips for how you built your paper ones? My current plan is to go on 120# paper, that's the heaviest Staples uses for colour copying.

Plasticviking325 Jan 2017 7:28 a.m. PST

Very nice. Great to see more card/paper ships. I also found out it was tricky to shrink Hotz ships too far. .. Maybe a solid deck/hull with the sides wrapped around ?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.