Help support TMP


"Section Volley Fire" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the Victorian Colonial Board Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Horse, Foot and Guns


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Some Parroom Adventurers

These models gave Adam the perfect opportunity to experiment with Citadel's new Foundation paints.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


836 hits since 13 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Imperium et libertas13 Jul 2015 5:44 a.m. PST

One often reads that the British Infantry of the late-Victorian period used 'Section Volley Fire', but what exactly does that mean / entail?

I am assuming that it was simply a way to control the rate of fire / ammo supply, as it was still used after the introduction of the Lee Metford. I further assume that the soldiers still aimed and picked individual targets, rather than just firing to their front, like musketeers of old.

Can any of the great minds of TMP shed a bit more light on the subject? How many rounds per minute, for example? When was it last used? And why was it dropped?

It sounds archaic, but I am guessing it was a pretty effective tactic?

Personal logo x42brown Supporting Member of TMP13 Jul 2015 7:24 a.m. PST

Not reall knowledge but I think the volley fire was for extream range where there was not much chance of hitting.

I base this on the early WW1 'Volley Sights' on Lee Enfields with calibrations up to 3900yds.

x42

Personal logo Artilleryman Supporting Member of TMP13 Jul 2015 10:30 a.m. PST

This makes sense. The British Army was still teaching 'volley fire' for the L1A1 SLR (i.e. a whole section aiming at the same target) for targets at extreme range in the 1980s. The number of rounds would always be stated (e.g. '5 rounds at my command') and aimed fire was expected.

Personal logo Dye4minis Supporting Member of TMP13 Jul 2015 11:25 a.m. PST

Sounds like a mechanism to impliment firs discipline within a unit. Probably has it roots on the WSS?

It is also a way the unit leadership can maintain control over the men for a bit longer. A unit that acts together as a unit is also harder to break. It also helps to keep the men focused upon the job at hand rather then allowing their minds to drift and dwell upon more negative issues. It is one of those "in the weeds" items that makes a difference in the real world but often gets ignored, glossed over or the results too difficult for rules designers to change their value sets from "numbers of casualties" to the effects of the fire that go beyond the numbers.

Well, that's my take after studying such things for the past 30 years. YMMV.

Imperium et libertas14 Jul 2015 8:01 a.m. PST

Thanks for the replies.

At first glance, it seems like an out-moded tactic, which is why I was keen to dig a bit deeper. If it was primarily a way of limiting the ROF to (eg) 5 rounds a minute, then I guess it makes sense.

Also, as Dye4minis states, it would also keep the men focused and cohesive.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.