Help support TMP


"Ship's boats on Confederate ironclads" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board

Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Fire and Steel


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

Battle Cry in Miniature

A Civil War boardgame is adapted to miniature wargaming.


Featured Book Review


1,063 hits since 12 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
MotownMachinist12 Jul 2015 4:53 p.m. PST

Was it common for Confederate ironclads to sortie with boats on davits or were they removed – even towed? Two examples: Atlanta making a run for Wassaw Sound and Chicora and Palmetto State venturing out to attack Union blockaders. I would appreciate some input on this subject as I am currently assembling 1/600th CS ironclads.

138SquadronRAF12 Jul 2015 5:28 p.m. PST

This picture of the Charleston Squadron shows them being towed behind.

link

Oddball13 Jul 2015 7:23 a.m. PST

I'm deeply offended by the flags on that website. I hope that the page will change it's displays.

Oh, ya, cool print of Southern iron on the water. Charleston Sqd is one of my favorite groups of ships.

EJNashIII15 Jul 2015 7:35 p.m. PST

It really depends on the ship in question. Many Confederate ironclads sortied before they were completed. For example, CSS Arkansas went into battle without some of it's armor, much less it's boats.

MotownMachinist16 Jul 2015 6:13 p.m. PST

That is a great painting 138SquadronRAF. I can see Castle Pinckney in the background. The artist is looking northwest from the direction of James Island. Perhaps even from Fort Ripley. The squadron is returning to Charleston.
I believe you are correct EJNashill. The presence of boats was probably dependent on various factors. Some of these factors I have considered but others, like the fact of a ship not being completed, I had not thought of.

Master Caster21 Jul 2015 6:55 p.m. PST

The only time I can recall ships' boats being taken into battle on purpose was CSS Virginia on the first day engagement against USS Cumberland, Congress and Minnesota where they were blown away. Larger sea-going sail and auxiliary sail ships generally took them as well especially on long voyages. If they knew they were going into battle and had a chance to stow the hem at a staging area or anchorage they were left behind I believe. In a pinch, I also believe some were floated and tied to the stern and towed such as in the painting of the Charleston Squadron.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.