Help support TMP


"What Board Game Geek says About AoS" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Warhammer Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Hordes of the Things


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

WarChest's Hykolaran Starter Set

Pick up the Hykolaran Starter Set, and you're ready to play WarChest. But how do the figures paint up?


Featured Workbench Article

Black Cat Bases' Vampire Queen

alizardincrimson2 Fezian sails to the Skeleton Seas, and finds inspiration as she goes.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,449 hits since 12 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Mithmee12 Jul 2015 7:43 a.m. PST

A 4.47 Rating

link

Now that is bad.

Now this 10.0 rating is a tad suspect.

A fantastic game. More tactical than Warhammer Fantasy Battle (and more fun); even better than Space Hulk and surpasses even the mighty Dreadfleet.

But, what I like the most is that this game has incredible resource management -simply put, the wealthiest player has the advantage just like leaders in history/real life. Therefore, I can now beat 'peasant-gamers' (who can't afford an army like mine) all the time. Yessssss, result !!!!!!

Wow!!! Games Workshop you have delivered again (we love you GW).

I think the comment about Dreadfleet is what makes it suspect.

So that 4.47 Rating should even be lower.

Winston Smith12 Jul 2015 7:57 a.m. PST

I suspect sarcasm is involved.

stecal Supporting Member of TMP12 Jul 2015 8:09 a.m. PST

Don't know what GW was thinking. If they want to compete in the fantasy skirmish game they have to come up with something better than established games like Warmachine or malifaux.

Best comment I saw was on Warseer – seems like a game written by 10 year olds who want to dump all the models they own on the table and start pushing them around. 10 year olds with parent's money are probably the target audience anyway.

JSchutt12 Jul 2015 8:13 a.m. PST

It is all sarcasm! The 10 rating is as much a part of sarcasm as saying the poster believes players with the most disposable income will have an advantage…. implying "peasants" are not a GW target audience. Will an isolated 10 rating really have more tangible value than playing it's part in sarcastic effect?

Dynaman878912 Jul 2015 8:37 a.m. PST

Yup, a tiny itty bitty teensy weensy bit of sarcasm there.

the trojan bunny12 Jul 2015 1:46 p.m. PST

That review is definitely trolling.

picture

Feet up now12 Jul 2015 3:50 p.m. PST

Looks like the 1 ratings are the real troll comments.Even if the rules are crap . The figures and anything else added equate to a 1 ?.
Really.
90% of the people who buy it probably don't even know BBG exists.

Definitely troll user rating is 2 to 5 year olds. LoL

Intrepide13 Jul 2015 10:21 a.m. PST

The comments are interesting. I wonder about this one though:

'And then they have the audacity to admit the "funny" rules are to embarrass older players and keep them from playing in public? It is just the worst possible release laced with insult…they burned the base for no reason. Very sad.'

If true, amazingly stupid move on GW's part.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.