Help support TMP


"A WW1 Naval Celebrity Deathmatch - GHQ vs WTJ" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board

Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


2,008 hits since 1 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
yarkshire gamer01 Jul 2015 11:06 a.m. PST

picture

link

Evening All,

I've just finished some more 1/2400 WW1 Naval stuff including some samples from WTJ, so I thought I would have a bit of fun and square the two brands off against each other.

Based on look, price, durablity etc lets have your preference. I will count all the votes in the various places this is posted and then announce a winner at the end of the month. Just put WTJ or GHQ.

Regards, Ken
The Yarkshire Gamer

ScottS01 Jul 2015 12:03 p.m. PST

Man, WWI Naval wargaming is sooooo tempting.

I wish the folks in my area were more interested.

idontbelieveit01 Jul 2015 12:46 p.m. PST

Nice. You gotta have masts though…

Personal logo Yellow Admiral Supporting Member of TMP01 Jul 2015 3:37 p.m. PST

I added wire masts to most of mine, and it adds a nice touch. I add a control top by slicing a tiny bit of plastic or aluminum tube, slipping it down the wire pole, and supergluing it in place. This doesn't look quite as nice as the GHQ control tops cast into the right shapes (sometimes with portholes!!), but it does a good enough job in 1/2400 scale. They look very similar to the masts in this picture posted by War Artisan:


Note that his ships also have just a bit of running rigging. I love the effect so much I'm considering retrofitting it to my models.

I think yards would also add a lot, but would be too fragile for my storage and transport needs, so I don't add those either.

The one thing I hate about GHQ models is the fragile pewter masts. I can't bring myself to replace them since they have all that nice superstructure cast on (I couldn't craft nearly as nice a solution), but they bend and break off too easily.

- Ix

Personal logo Yellow Admiral Supporting Member of TMP01 Jul 2015 4:08 p.m. PST

To answer the original question: I can't vote one over the other.

I consider GHQ and WTJ equivalent at the moment. Both have excellent detail, the WTJs have better proportions and cost less, but the GHQs are a tad easier to paint up. My purchasing is going to trend toward WTJ from now on based on cost, until/unless I find an unforeseen disadvantage. (e.g., the long-term durability of the printed plastic is unknown).

- Ix

dragon6 Supporting Member of TMP02 Jul 2015 9:38 a.m. PST

The one thing I hate about GHQ models is the fragile pewter masts. I can't bring myself to replace them since they have all that nice superstructure cast on (I couldn't craft nearly as nice a solution), but they bend and break off too easily.

Ix have you considered cutting the vertical element (mast) off then drilling the superstructure and inserting a wire mast? Definitely a bit of work but it does 'fix' the pewter problem.

Samsonov12 Jul 2015 2:05 p.m. PST

To derail the thread, Hallmark 1/6000.

yarkshire gamer14 Jul 2015 9:35 a.m. PST

Hi Samsonov,

Not really a derail as they are a completely different scale.

Fantastic ships though, many years ago I used to paint orders for the then owner of Hallmark and also did a stock of painted stuff for him to carry at shows. Having painted thousands and I mean thousands of 1/6000 I ain't going back !

Regards, Ken
yarkshiregamer.blogspot.co.uk

Personal logo Yellow Admiral Supporting Member of TMP17 Jul 2015 8:43 a.m. PST

Ix have you considered cutting the vertical element (mast) off then drilling the superstructure and inserting a wire mast?

Tried it, even. The really hard part is drilling a hole into the underside of the part of the pewter mast I want to keep, like these:




I haven't been able to craft a nice replacement for all that military superstructure lofted above the deck of the later armored cruisers.

Fortunately, most ships don't have anything like that, so I can cradft wire-and-tube-section masts almost exactly similar to this cast pewter one from GHQ:

- Ix

PS: One of these days I'll get pictures of my stuff on line…

dantheman26 Jul 2015 3:55 p.m. PST

Yorkshiregamer

The game in your link, is it in 1/6000 scale? Very nice paint job

Any chance your willing to spill the beans, in detail, on how you paint them?

Dan

yarkshire gamer27 Jul 2015 10:06 a.m. PST

link

Hi Dan, cheers for the interest, my WW2 stuff is all Skytrex or Navwar which is 1/3000, I did a tutorial on my method of painting them on t'blog a while back, the link is above. Hope you find it useful.

Regards, Ken
yarkshiregamer.blogspot.co.uk

dantheman27 Jul 2015 1:04 p.m. PST

Thanks!!

Part time gamer12 Aug 2015 10:35 p.m. PST

These look great. And Yes, WTJ are coming out with some really great models now, and both a larger selection of both scale and ships, both Predreadnaught and WWI.

I have a very few of the 1/6000 scale, ah, Figurehead as I recall now. However in that scale I only go for WW II and then only Battleships and Battlecruisers. Personally, thats great if you want to fight Jutland, but other wise.. too small even for cruiser fights.

yarkshire gamer25 Aug 2015 4:16 a.m. PST

Well TMP you are well and truly a bunch of fence sitters !

Looking at all the formats that Yarkshire Gamer is on there was a general feeling that both companies provide excellent models each with their own outstanding points and minor niggles.

Most responders highlighted this and the few who expressed an opinion where equal in their choices ! So it was a draw.

For me the best thing is that we have two companies supplying excellent models in a niche scale in a niche period in a niche field of a niche hobby and we have choice. Best order some new ships for my "small" WW1 fleets from both companies then.

Regards and thanks for voting, Ken
yarkshiregamer.blogspot.co.uk

warren bruhn26 Aug 2015 6:37 p.m. PST

Nice looking WW2 ships on your blog, yarkshire gamer. The sea bases are pretty impressive.

Surprised that the voting was even. I wonder if it will be even in a couple of years when more WTJ models are available. The recent major price increase for GHQ puts those out of my consideration, though I have a lot of them in my collection. Hate gluing on little turrets and things though. Makes me really love those WTJ models.

Personal logo Yellow Admiral Supporting Member of TMP26 Aug 2015 7:02 p.m. PST

For me the best thing is that we have two companies supplying excellent models in a niche scale in a niche period in a niche field of a niche hobby and we have choice.

Hear hear! It's nice to be spoiled. :-)

- Ix

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.