Help support TMP


"A M42 Duster question" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Combined Arms


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 7

These four are easily identified!


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


Current Poll


1,139 hits since 17 Jun 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

HistoryPhD17 Jun 2015 8:40 p.m. PST

Exactly where did the spent shell casings eject? The turret was fairly small and quite cramped, being filled with the twin breech blocks and the two gunners. The loaders had to stand on the back deck, as there was no room for them in the turret. So it seems quite problematic if the shell casings were ejected onto the floor of the already crowded turret, where there would be no spare hands to get them out from under foot. However, I see no ejection ports anywhere on the outer surface of the turret. Anyone know what the process was? Thanks.

Garand17 Jun 2015 9:08 p.m. PST

There was a hole in the hull floor, so the shells ejected underneath the vehicle IIRC.

Damon.

HistoryPhD17 Jun 2015 9:29 p.m. PST

That makes more sense

epturner18 Jun 2015 6:26 a.m. PST

Garand is correct. I just asked the retired CW5 who works for me and who was a Duster crewman, well, before I was born… grin

Eric

HistoryPhD18 Jun 2015 8:36 a.m. PST

Thanks very much guys!

Personal logo Inari7 Supporting Member of TMP18 Jun 2015 9:00 a.m. PST

Yes, underneath. The shells were also kept on the sides of the Turret/Tub before being loaded into the guns.

I was an M-42 crewman from 84'-86' FL ANG

HistoryPhD18 Jun 2015 10:09 a.m. PST

Now I just have to figure out what diameter of brass rod equals a 1/100 40mm round

leidang18 Jun 2015 11:00 a.m. PST

.3281 mm = 40mm at 15mm scale

HistoryPhD18 Jun 2015 2:24 p.m. PST

Excellent! Thanks. A bit of brass wire is called for

Disco Joe18 Jun 2015 2:52 p.m. PST

I wish someone would make the M42 Duster in 1/56.

Mako1118 Jun 2015 10:49 p.m. PST

Hmmm, I get .4mm, e.g. 1/100th of 40mm.

Of course, the shell casing is a bit wider, which is why I think 0.6 – 0.8mm is a good starting point for the whole round.

capncarp19 Jun 2015 7:52 a.m. PST

Except for the relative lack of gun crew protection, it would seem a Duster would be a fairly formidable opponent to an infantry charge.
A bit messy in its employ, too; but effective.

HistoryPhD19 Jun 2015 10:31 a.m. PST

The shells cast into the feed rollers on the model are definitely over scale, so a bit bigger will be necessary to match those. I'll try 0.6mm

Mako1119 Jun 2015 11:21 a.m. PST

Haven't seen them, but suspect those shells will be at least 1mm in diameter, since anything smaller than 1mm is really small.

HistoryPhD19 Jun 2015 2:49 p.m. PST

We'll see. If 0.6mm turns out too small, I'll just use it for .50cal rounds.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.