Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2015 1:38 p.m. PST |
I like the Science Board. It has a lot of neat stuff on it. But the Climate Change people, both pro and con, annoy me. They routinely violate TMP rules by quoting important stuff for more than three paragraphs and insult news sources. And the skeptics, like me are just as bad. Shall these special snowflakes have their own board, so that sensitive flowers like myself and the OFM can turn it off? |
Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2015 1:38 p.m. PST |
And shall we be required to spell all words in titles correctly? |
Dentatus | 14 Jun 2015 1:43 p.m. PST |
You mean discussion on 'Random Effects Generator" tables for TTG scenarios? (Severe weather, gravitational anomalies, and such) If no, then I think not. |
14Bore | 14 Jun 2015 1:46 p.m. PST |
Typos happen, unless your a English Major then no excuses. As per you question – no. |
Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2015 1:47 p.m. PST |
If the anisotropy of g is relevant then yes. But only if it can be proved to be anthrogenic. |
jeffreyw3 | 14 Jun 2015 1:51 p.m. PST |
I fully support creating a private Facebook group for the purpose of holding all TMP discussions of climate change. |
Cyrus the Great | 14 Jun 2015 2:15 p.m. PST |
No matter how many different ways you ask the same question, the answer is still NO |
skipper John | 14 Jun 2015 2:27 p.m. PST |
Woohoo!! Another dead horse!!!! Shoot it… SHOOT IT!!!! |
enfant perdus | 14 Jun 2015 2:51 p.m. PST |
We could resurrect the Wargamers and Religion Board. Same difference. |
IanKHemm | 14 Jun 2015 2:53 p.m. PST |
|
floating white bear | 14 Jun 2015 2:55 p.m. PST |
I think we should have a Washing Machine board. Why should anything be irrelevant here? |
floating white bear | 14 Jun 2015 3:10 p.m. PST |
|
enfant perdus | 14 Jun 2015 3:13 p.m. PST |
That would fall under Housing and Home Improvement. Oddly enough, I have a question about choosing a gun and we don't have a firearms board. Odd, considering the number of firearms enthusiasts hereabouts. Anyway. Ground floor: Perfumery, stationery and leather goods, wigs and haberdashery, kitchenware and food. Going up! |
hedeby | 14 Jun 2015 3:31 p.m. PST |
|
Disco Joe | 14 Jun 2015 3:36 p.m. PST |
|
Mute Bystander | 14 Jun 2015 3:55 p.m. PST |
NO, No, no, no way in heck. |
KSmyth | 14 Jun 2015 4:07 p.m. PST |
Surely you jest. This will lead to . . . what? |
Dynaman8789 | 14 Jun 2015 4:26 p.m. PST |
I think we need a "New Discussion Board poll" discussion board, where all these attempts to bait people into political discussions can go. |
Winston Smith | 14 Jun 2015 4:32 p.m. PST |
|
Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut | 14 Jun 2015 4:42 p.m. PST |
Please yes. All of my yes. More boards, more confusion, hail Disordia, all hail Eris! |
skippy0001 | 14 Jun 2015 4:49 p.m. PST |
Yes. Providing Bill can call down a A-10 Airstrike/Davy Crocket/FAE/Dora/Thor/Atomic Annie on everyone there when foaming at the mouth shows up. No reason NOT to have sub-boards that are tied into the main boards. It's already done. All research could be collated and cited and since ALL of us are part of The Finest Minds Of Human Civilisation Think Tank we should reach a conclusion. So there. Neener, Neener. |
StoneMtnMinis | 14 Jun 2015 5:06 p.m. PST |
If we get one it should go in the fantasy section. |
Mako11 | 14 Jun 2015 5:37 p.m. PST |
Nyet comrade. For such an important issue of our day as this, it requires a completely new site, similar to the Blue Fez, since it IS the most dire threat to our existence, currently (or so I'm told by the talking heads), surpassing even ISIS, other islamic terrorist orgs (yes, I used the little "I" on purpose), unemployment, deflation/stagflation, etc., etc. I've got a few catchy names in mind, but can't name them openly here, since I'd be locked in the DH for eons. Perhaps naming it after that pontificating, jet-setting, carbon-spewing, rich guy, who is a real "bore" might be appropriate. |
Grelber | 14 Jun 2015 6:08 p.m. PST |
Winston, I believe we need two new boards to handle this, one pro-climate change and the other anti-climate change. Since both sides routinely ignore the other side's input, they won't have to bother even looking at it. Besides, this will give you the fun of turning off not one, but two boards! Oh the excitement! Be still my pounding heart! Grelber |
skippy0001 | 14 Jun 2015 8:40 p.m. PST |
Well, since Climate Change has a lot to do with water, both sides of the issue should be water boarded on a Water Board. |
Martin Rapier | 15 Jun 2015 2:05 a.m. PST |
Just leave science alone, as terrement says, you can always ignore/stifle particularly annoying posters. If it becomes too political (and sadly, Climate Change has become much more about politics these days, and a lot less to do with science), then send it to UM. |
RavenscraftCybernetics | 15 Jun 2015 9:32 a.m. PST |
|
SBminisguy | 15 Jun 2015 9:45 a.m. PST |
There is a board for this kind of politically challenged topic, it's called the Blue Fez. |
Weasel | 15 Jun 2015 9:53 a.m. PST |
We do, it's the science board ;) It's tucked away under TMP plus, so let people do their thing. |
javelin98 | 15 Jun 2015 4:30 p.m. PST |
You know what would be cool? If we had a "Wargaming Board". That would be so freakin' awesome. |
Sundance | 15 Jun 2015 4:41 p.m. PST |
Only if you invented the internet. |
mandt2 | 15 Jun 2015 9:22 p.m. PST |
I think the subject should be banned, just like religion, and politics. Interesting how a couple people here are even using this thread to make their opinions on it known. It's a strange obsession. |
javelin98 | 16 Jun 2015 9:06 a.m. PST |
I mean, think about it -- a board where we could go and talk about nothing but wargaming and miniatures. We could call it "The Page of Miniatures" or something. |
Dasher | 16 Jun 2015 11:58 p.m. PST |
|