"SU-100 and the Armour Train." Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board Back to the Dioramas Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
World War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Profile Article Report from Day One!
Featured Movie Review
|
| Tango01 | 26 May 2015 11:45 a.m. PST |
Excellent dio here!
more here.
link Hope you enjoy! Amicalement
Armand |
| batesmotel34 | 27 May 2015 7:18 a.m. PST |
Looking at the link, I'm a bit puzzled for why the SU-100 is blithely driving parallel to a German armored train that appears to still be manned. The diorama would make more sense is the armored were obviously abandoned. Chris |
| Terry37 | 27 May 2015 9:21 a.m. PST |
Truly beautiful work!!! Terry |
| Tango01 | 27 May 2015 10:47 a.m. PST |
Glad you like it my friend!. (smile) Amicalement
Armand |
| Griefbringer | 27 May 2015 12:22 p.m. PST |
By the time SU-100 started to see action, how many armoured trains did the Germans still have operational? |
| Mobius | 27 May 2015 12:26 p.m. PST |
There was a battle between Panzer Triebwagen Nr. 16 and an SU-85 somewhere in Poland.
|
| No longer can support TMP | 27 May 2015 1:58 p.m. PST |
I'm with you Chris. It's beautiful work marred by a stupid scenario. For example, why haven't the Pz IV turrets greased the SU-100 with a flank shot? For that matter, we know that it's not the moment of an ambush because there is an injured Russian soldier being tended to by a medic. So why were the tank riders still on the tank? It's basically the case of the model builder having an armoured train, an SU-100 model, and a bunch of figures and plunking them on a base without thinking the whole scene through. |
|
