Help support TMP


"An Interesting article on the End Of Days. " Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Warhammer Message Board

Back to the Warhammer 40K Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Savage Worlds: Showdown


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,559 hits since 9 May 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Covert Walrus09 May 2015 10:32 p.m. PST

From the Bell Of Lost Souls FB page

link

MH Dee10 May 2015 5:50 a.m. PST

The thing I got from that article is the author describing himself as 'middle-aged', then it turns out he is 33.

What in actual Hell is that all about?

PatrickWR10 May 2015 6:13 a.m. PST

Not the first time I've wished TMP had a "like" button so I could like MH Dee's quip above.

Personal logo Condotta Supporting Member of TMP10 May 2015 6:22 a.m. PST

Maybe he refers to another "middle age". Otherwise, he is young and his sense of time and place is still unformed, so the context is irrelevant. Perhaps this is all part of his Covert Walrus op? Ha-ha.

Covert Walrus, it will be interesting to see what 9th actually brings. I'm wondering about basing some figs, so hope we find out soon.

Mithmee10 May 2015 8:11 a.m. PST

The thing I got from that article is the author describing himself as 'middle-aged', then it turns out he is 33.

To GW that is middle age when compared to there normal customer age target.

Agent Smith10 May 2015 10:53 a.m. PST

No to current GW ageism thats ancient!

15mm and 28mm Fanatik10 May 2015 12:17 p.m. PST

Most people in GW's target age range probably don't have the disposable income required to purchase their products.

Winston Smith10 May 2015 4:22 p.m. PST

He qualifies for a Senior Citizen discount.

Mithmee11 May 2015 12:21 p.m. PST

Not from GW, nope they would more than likely charge more.

IronMike25 May 2015 8:12 a.m. PST

The author of the article makes some interesting statements about why GW is doing what they're (rumored to be) doing, and what do you dillweeds pay attention to? The fact that the author refers to himself as 'middle-aged' before remorselessly beating the old 'GW sells to kids' dead horse once again.

And you wonder why GW doesn't take 'real gamers' seriously.

Baranovich25 May 2015 6:04 p.m. PST

One of the keys to this is that Warhammer fantasy players are more often just gaming with the armies they already have, whether recent minis or retro minis. While they were GW customers at one time or another, now Ebay and other trading places have made it easy to add additional troops to existing armies or start new ones while bypassing GW retail prices altogether.

No question that Warhammer fantasy is viewed as the more "mature" version of GW gaming. I have never once had the least bit of interest in 40k – ever. I can't stand it. I have never liked skirmish-sized forces, and I have no interest in the futuristic Warhammer universe.

They way 40k is marketed and packaged, it has the "feel" of being more of a magic the gathering or Xwing miniatures type-game.

At gaming clubs, I have seen younger players literally set up like three or four vehicle models per side for a 40k game, with NO terrain, NO table, and NO movement of the minis! They literally sat across from each other and played 40k like they were playing a game of poker.

I''m not saying that describes all 40k players, but there is no question that the huge appeal of 40k is simply that it's a lot less work to play, and you have more exciting "boom" and "crash" things happening. Big guns, big suits of mech armor, it's like GW's version of Fast and Furious.

By contrast Warhammer fantasy is like a grand chess match in which the playing pieces are brought to life through a great deal of color and effort.

Except for the fact that 40k minis are just as prohibitively expensive as fantasy minis are, 40k could very easily be played using nothing but gaming counters and a hex board, it's "closer" to that than fantasy is. Fantasy could be played that way as well, but it's less likely given the fact that for many gamers of fantasy and historical take great pleasure in the grand visuals of the gaming table, and less likely to settle for fielding unpainted minis and cardboard cutout terrain.

From a business perspective what GW is doing to fantasy is totally justified. They have no obligation to remain loyal to an old guard of fantasy players. They are a publicly traded company that must make a profit. Like them or hate them, making Warhammer fantasy more skirmish-like and making it closer to 40k makes huge sense and will probably succeed.

BUT, as I've said a hundred times(and this is what ticks me off about all of this), is that the only facet of Warhammer that a new edition truly impacts are the dreaded tournament players. I say dreaded because tournament Warhammer generally has to play the current edition, so for the tournament gamers, they are waiting for the new starter set so they can begin laser-cutting the new army lists apart and look at them with their dang accounting magnifying glasses so they can begin to build their spreadsheets and maximize every last drop of stat-blood from it….while sucking all the fun and fantasy out of fantasy gaming.

But as I said, GW has no obligation to remain true to tournament gamers or to old-guard Warhammer players. They are a business. I laugh when I see these kinds of blogs on Youtube and other places where gamers tell GW what they "think GW should be doing" with their business. GW could care less, and the truth is, if these keyboard warriors were given control of running GW's business, they would totally destroy it within a week. There's a huge difference between thinking what GW "should" do for its gaming community vs. what will continue to make them money.

Particularly the Youtube channels that say that GW "walked away from supporting tournaments" and is now "paying the price for it". They are? Last time I checked the company is still profitable. LOL. WHO EVER SAID that GW had any obligation to support tournaments??? Except tournament gamers saying it?

Warhammer 9th will attract new gamers into fantasy and will tick off many old-guard Warhammer players. GW needs new blood, pure and simple. They can't give away a new edition of one of their core games for free. They can't please everybody.

And as I said, the tournament scene players are the ones who have their b**ls tied when a new edition comes out, which is yet another great reason to not be a tournament gamer.

If you are free of the shackles of all that competitive nonsense, then you are still free to play 8th, 7th, 6th, or even 3rd edition of Warhammer. Or even make your own rules! GW supplies models and then supplies suggested rules to use. But ultimately you can do whatever you want! It's YOUR GAME.

GW isn't going to come bashing down your door because you're not buying and playing the current edition of their game!

Mithmee25 May 2015 9:46 p.m. PST

Thing is they have not been making as much money as they use to.

They got hammered in the Chapter House lawsuit, sure they got $25,000 USD from it but they lost on all of the major items.

As for attracting more players into WFB with 9th that is yet to be seen.

But currently buying a decent size WFB army will impact your wallet by around $800 USD-$1200.

New players just can't afford that.

Der Krieg Geist06 Jun 2015 8:28 a.m. PST

I don' t want to come across as harsh but come off it already. I can not afford a new Porsh 911 either, but trumpeting their emmenant demise for FIFTEEN YEARS…. Is just getting old and tiresome. Do not get me wrong, I get you and others. I miss the older GW also but…….. News flash………. They. Are. Gone. Please , the horse is long dead, can we collectively just stop beating it. Let's just paint nice miniatures and play fun games. Lord was this a rant? Sorry

Mithmee07 Jun 2015 8:42 a.m. PST

I actually do not like most of their current miniatures.

Take their latest Treeman miniature.

picture

That is not a Treeman.

Oh and these horrible miniatures

picture

Der Krieg Geist07 Jun 2015 7:45 p.m. PST

To each their own my man. I like the top thing but I would be hard pressed to imagine it as a treeman/Ent. The other things are very goofy to me. cobra surfing dead guys???? Guess someone thought it was a cool idea. It is original at least ;)

Thomas Thomas12 Jun 2015 12:39 p.m. PST

Miniature quality has declined.

Just look at the Bretonians.

TomT

Mithmee12 Jun 2015 4:30 p.m. PST

Well the Bretonians are one of the Armies that more than likely get…

Squated

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.