"The Great Train Robbery, Partisans versus the Armored Train " Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Land Gallery Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article sargonII, traveling in the Middle East, continues his report on the gates of Jerusalem.
Featured Movie Review
|
| Tango01 | 20 Apr 2015 10:18 p.m. PST |
"My buddy Bob Rossi purchased this beautiful train painted by John Sulek well over a year ago and had never played it. So, our idea was find an excuse and get it on the table! Trains would most likely have been engaged in keeping the rail line open for other non-armored trains so their natural enemy was partisans. I just happen to have a partisan battalion that had not been played in well over 4 years, so it seamed like a match made in heaven. If you have not looked at the partisan list I totally understand, they are pretty bad. The problem lies with the basic rules of Flames of War: it is terrible at doing asymmetrical warfare. Their only solution is to add more stands of terrible infantry, which is not a good solution at all. Well, its all we have to work with right now so I went with it…"
Main page
link Amicalement
Armand |
|
.jpg "picture")
.jpg "picture")