Dean AKI | 22 Mar 2015 8:11 a.m. PST |
Hello folks, I've written up a complete scenario, suitable for most rules and periods before about 1880; in the style of Mr Grants' 'Scenarios for Wargames' (gawd, I love that book!).
You naturally will find the full write up here: link And if your not familiar with the inspiration for the format and content, you really should be checking it out… |
normsmith | 22 Mar 2015 9:48 a.m. PST |
Thanks, a nicely presented situation. Looking forward to your own AAR. |
olicana | 22 Mar 2015 10:55 a.m. PST |
That one opens up a few options. Nice scenario idea. |
monger | 22 Mar 2015 7:15 p.m. PST |
Oh nice. I like this scenario. I also love Grants work. I draw from it often for some excellent battles. Keep up the good work! Kurtus |
monger | 22 Mar 2015 7:16 p.m. PST |
Oh nice. I like this scenario. I also love Grants work. I draw from it often for some excellent battles. I may have a go with this scenario and post it here. I am thinking Late WW II is in order. Keep up the good work! Kurtus |
Dean AKI | 23 Mar 2015 4:09 a.m. PST |
Be interested to see if it can apply to WW2, I figured that long ranged artillery etc may make it lose it's particulars at this scale… |
monger | 24 Mar 2015 10:56 a.m. PST |
It would work. No reason long range art. has to be available. Mortar support was more common. I am imagining a small engagement here (platoon size). Maybe company level. It will take a lil thought, but I think it can be done. Thinking of trying it out (with adjustments) using the Battlegroup rules. |
wargame insomniac | 25 Mar 2015 1:51 p.m. PST |
I do like the work you do in preparing game scenarios. Really enjoyed the game. Thanks Dean |
Maxshadow | 26 Mar 2015 3:30 a.m. PST |
Nice scenario. More please! |
Dean AKI | 09 Apr 2015 7:51 a.m. PST |
Another scenario going up very soon… |