Help support TMP


"Making Wargames - Brent Spivey Interview" Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Blogs of War Message Board

Back to the Game Design Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Derivan Paints: Striking It Lucky With Colour

Sometimes at a convention, you can be just dead lucky and find a real bargain.


Featured Profile Article

Raincoats

Editor Julia reports once again on our Christmas fundraising project.


Current Poll


1,299 hits since 20 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

evilleMonkeigh20 Mar 2015 9:41 a.m. PST

Brent Spivey (who has created, amongst other things, the Origins nominees Havoc and Battlefield: Miniature Modern Warfare) has given some very useful insights on making wargames.

General interview is here
link

Game Design/Playtesting insights here
link

Well worth a read if you're interested in designing games.

Personal logo McLaddie Supporting Member of TMP21 Mar 2015 8:23 a.m. PST

A very interesting discussion. Thanks for sharing.

Once it's felt that a certain degree of balance has been met, the game rules and other data is put into a computer simulation program and large volume virtual testing is performed. While the program we use most certainly doesn't rival Google's AI or feature true 'deep learning', it's pretty slick and extremely useful for spotting exploits, tendencies, and patterns. Small tweaks to the game are then made based on the information.

Yes, that is the first reference I have seen of a designer using a computer to suss out patterns in the game processes. It would be interesting to know what program Brent used.

This one has both me and my group completely obsessed with playing it like nothing else ever has. It's one of the first games that has me thinking about it as much from a player's viewpoint as a designer's viewpoint.

I think this is a great indicator, but also an interesting point about game designers.

Raph Koster noted this in his book, A Theory of Fun for Game Design.

Game designers spend less time playing individual games than the typical gamer does. Game designers finish games less often than typical players do. They have less time to play a give game because they typically sample so many of them…

Basically, game designers suffer from what I call "designeritis." They are hypersensitive to patterns in games. They 'grok' them very readily and move on. They see past fiction very easily. They build up encyclopedic recollections of games past and present, and then then theoretically use these to make new games.

I often see this disconnect between gamers and game designers in discussing game design. Game designer often play for analysis rather than enjoyment. [though obviously, designers enjoy the analysis part…] In talking about games, the two groups will talk past each other.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.