"Largest ACW battles - infantry actually engaged" Topic
16 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAmerican Civil War
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleThe modeler himself shows how he paints Guilford Courthouse in 40mm scale.
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor heads for Vicksburg...
Featured Book Review
|
CATenWolde | 24 Feb 2015 5:23 a.m. PST |
Hi, This is a pretty straightforward question, but as I'm planning how to fill out my ACW armies, I thought I would double-check here. What I am interested in is the total number of men engaged in the largest battles of the ACW, so that I can purchase/paint with some plan in mind … for a change! ;) In general, I've been assuming Gettysburg provides a good target: in round numbers, 75,000 Union infantry and 60,000 Confederate infantry present (even if they weren't all fighting at the same time). I know that the Confederate army at Fredericksburg may have been a bit larger, but haven't been able to parse the exact numbers of infantry – however I think it would only have been a few thousand men larger at most? Likewise, the Union at Fredericksburg, and especially Chancellorsville, was theoretically much larger than that of Gettysburg, although those numbers were never fully utilized, and I don't have detailed OB's. So does 75k for the Union and 60k for the CSA sound about right? It seems that the AoP had access to around 100k infantry during the Fredericksburg/Chancellorsville period, but it seems to be an anomoly. Would bumping the CSA numbers to 65k take into account the largest that the ANV grew at Fredericksburg? Remember, this only infantry under arms. Cheers, Christopher |
ScottWashburn | 24 Feb 2015 5:46 a.m. PST |
The battle with the largest totals present was, I believe, the Seven Days Battle, but only a small fraction of the armies were engaged at any given time. |
ChrisBBB | 24 Feb 2015 6:06 a.m. PST |
Hi Christopher, Here are the figures I compiled for the size of the armies at the biggest ACW battles. How many of these were "actually engaged", I couldn't say, but maybe this helps. Battle Union Confederate Seven Days 104,000 92,000 Chancellorsville 133,868 60,892 Fredricksburg 114,000 72,500 Cold Harbor 108,000 59,000 Gettysburg 94,000 72,000 The Wilderness 102,000 61,000 Spotsylvania Court House 100,000 52,000 Chickamauga 60,000 65,000 North Anna 68,000 53,000 Antietam 75,500 38,000 2nd Bull Run 62,000 50,000 Shiloh 66,812 44,699 Vicksburg 77,000 33,000 Missionary Ridge 56,359 44,010 Nashville 50,000 30,000 Stones River 41,400 35,000 Atlanta 34,863 40,438 Seven Pines / Fair Oaks 34,000 39,000 Chris
Bloody Big BATTLES! link |
uglyfatbloke | 24 Feb 2015 7:01 a.m. PST |
CaTenWolde…you have a PLAN?….shame on you sir; you're showing the rest of us up as sad, obsessive creatures with no self-control. |
CATenWolde | 24 Feb 2015 7:42 a.m. PST |
I know … it took me a long time to overcome my shame and build up the courage to post here! However, in my defense, I've had many other plans, and they lasted about as long as (and were as effective as) McClellan's plans … |
79thPA | 24 Feb 2015 8:23 a.m. PST |
I believe if you can field the complete armies for Antietam or Gettysburg, you can fight any battle out there. |
Cleburne1863 | 24 Feb 2015 8:31 a.m. PST |
I noticed Resaca was missing from the above list. Most or all of the two army groups were facing each other by May 15th. It would place near the Wilderness and Gettysburg on the list above. |
67thtigers | 24 Feb 2015 8:58 a.m. PST |
I made a Resaca scenario for VnB. Once you reduce the Federals to "effectives" the numbers were about 50,000 vs 40,000. link |
79thPA | 24 Feb 2015 9:07 a.m. PST |
@67thtigers: Thanks for that scenario. |
67thtigers | 24 Feb 2015 10:13 a.m. PST |
Infantry? Ummmm. The largest Confederate army that ever fought was during the Seven Days with about 113,282 PFD, and the only time in the East they outnumbered the Federals. Reducing that to infantry, and excluding the fixed garrisons gives: Dept of NC etc: 14,431 inf, 880 arty, 210 cav Jackson and DH Hill: 31,623 inf, 1,486 arty, 1,160 cav Longstreet and AP Hill: 29,112 inf, 1,532 arty Magruder: 14,947 inf, 831 arty Res. Arty: 1,238 arty Stuart's Cavalry: 3,996 cav, 141 arty = 90,113 inf, 6,108 arty (exc/ garrison arty), 5,366 cav 2nd Corps: 15,460 inf, 919 arty, 239 cav 3rd Corps: 16,047 inf, 855 arty, 717 cav 4th Corps: 12,060 inf, 582 arty, 712 cav 5th Corps: 23,716 inf, 1,193 arty, 999 cav 6th Corps: 16,867 inf, 798 arty, 920 cav Arty Res: 1,942 arty (field and horse) (exc/ 941 in siege train) Cav Div: 1,954 cav (arty included in reserve) = 84,150 inf, 6,289 arty, 5,541 cav There you have ca. 174,000 engaged infantry. I would guess that is the biggest number of engaged infantry in a "battle". |
kevin smoot | 24 Feb 2015 10:47 a.m. PST |
You can also find OOB's in Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. It's a four volume set and is pretty reliable. On a side note, the numbers involved mentioned in any history won't be 100% accurate. The Confederacy counted (thus listed) only bayonets – or combat personnel- in their rosters, where the Union counted everyone – teamsters, quartermasters, surgeons, etc. |
CATenWolde | 24 Feb 2015 11:29 a.m. PST |
Thanks for all the help! The Seven Days was difficult to parse, so that's especially useful. I'm aware of the differences in who counted whom and why, which makes things even more difficult. But these numbers give me some broad goals to work towards while I delve into the details of individual campaigns and battles. Cheers, Christopher |
Bill N | 24 Feb 2015 11:30 a.m. PST |
You can also find OOB's in Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. It's a four volume set and is pretty reliable. On a side note, the numbers involved mentioned in any history won't be 100% accurate. The Confederacy counted (thus listed) only bayonets – or combat personnel- in their rosters, where the Union counted everyone – teamsters, quartermasters, surgeons, etc. There's an understatement. Not only did the methods for computing strengths differ between the two sides, quite often the attempts to equalize the computations are skewed to show an army was stronger or weaker than it actually was. Although I like B&L, they are guilty of this as anyone. |
TKindred | 24 Feb 2015 2:22 p.m. PST |
The only thing that approaches any sort of reliability vis-a-vis numbers, are the Consolidated Monthly Reports of each side. These, however, are only reliable for that date, a snapshot of the unit, as it were. For the Gettysburg Campaign, when my old club built the armies, we took the numbers from the June 30th rolls, for the federals, and what we could locate from the same reports for the Lee's units. In some cases, we found the AAR's of CS regiments, which were pretty accurate when they gave their numbers, since the reports were written in a timely manner and taken from the notes and roll books of surviving officers and 1st sergeants of the reporting command. We sometimes did this for the federals. But in any case, for the federal forces, many, if not all, of their CMR's may be found either in the LoC or the Army Historical center at Carlisle. Copies of these are almost, but not always, available in state archives. For example, in Maine, copies of almost every regiment's consolidated monthly report are available in bound volumes and may be viewed with only a short notice to the staff. A quick note regarding CS numbers: Many of those "bayonets" counted included musicians, who were mustered with their respective companies for morning and evening reports, etc, so the ACTUAL numbers of men with weapons is often a little skewed by that. PLUS, some regiments counted only the enlisted in formation, while others did include the officers present for duty as well. Never say never when it comes to the ACW. |
1968billsfan | 25 Feb 2015 6:21 a.m. PST |
Stop painting when you can do Gettysburg at a 1:5 ratio. |
ChrisBBB | 27 Feb 2015 4:55 a.m. PST |
Cleburne1863 – thanks for the pointer about Resaca – duly added to my list. 67thtigers: interesting scenario. When you played it, how did it go? Chris |
|