Help support TMP


"Mini Review of the M50 SP by battlefront" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Product Reviews Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Team Yankee


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

Swimming With Warlords #1: Chagatai Ridge

Scenario ideas from Afghanistan in 2002.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


863 hits since 7 Feb 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
sgt Dutch Supporting Member of TMP07 Feb 2015 5:27 p.m. PST

One always needs more heavy artillery to pound back the enemy. My IDF force was lacking this. The new M50 SP was the answer. Overall it is not a bad model. If you look close I the model you will see the print layer found in 3D printing. The only problem I found is the tracks. These should be the HVSS type. It will cost me another $5.00 USD each to put the correct track system on it.

For more picture check my blog: link

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian07 Feb 2015 5:52 p.m. PST

Are you saying they didn't adequately prep the master, and so there are signs of 3D printing?

sgt Dutch Supporting Member of TMP07 Feb 2015 8:31 p.m. PST

Yes Bill. They didn't clean up the front face of the hull. Also the same goes for the main gun mount.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.