Help support TMP


"Gloss" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

Happy 80th Birthday for Katie's Grandmother

Personal logo Editor Katie The Editor of TMP surprises her grandmother on her 80th birthday.


Current Poll


1,545 hits since 30 Dec 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP30 Dec 2014 11:29 p.m. PST

Like many, I mostly paint in flat colours & then, using Krylon clear matte, give them a final spray that renders all colours flat.

Does anyone go back & add "gloss" to appropriate areas? eg oilskin wrapped shakos on Nap Prussians or the bodies of Zulus (who coated themselves in oils, evidently)?

Ivan DBA31 Dec 2014 12:15 a.m. PST

I have done this in the past. I have also done the opposite: after dipping plate-armored knights in Minwax (which left a nice gloss on the armor), I went back and applied a brush-on matte varnish to the few bits if fabric, leather, etc.

Veteran Cosmic Rocker31 Dec 2014 3:26 a.m. PST

I have done that for 28mm Naps in the past – but only for a few figures individually based for skirmish. Did I really notice the difference at that scale? Probably not

I do completely gloss my 6mm Naps though – I find at that scale it helps the colours come out

Yesthatphil31 Dec 2014 4:04 a.m. PST

I gloss 20mm and below, for pre 20th Century periods … they look better and as above, the colours come up nicely.

Phil

Timmo uk31 Dec 2014 5:34 a.m. PST

No, I reason that at the distance we'd need to be to make a real person 15/18/20mm or whatever we only see a mass of colour with the odd glint as the sun reflects off metal.

Sigwald31 Dec 2014 5:42 a.m. PST

Yes, I get the whole figure as matt as I want with spray dullcote then brush vallejo gloss varnish on where needed

MajorB31 Dec 2014 6:07 a.m. PST

I just use Coat d'Arms acrylic paints that are matt anyway, so I don't need any additional matt varnish. I prefer my figures matt to gloss, so don't use gloss varnish either.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP31 Dec 2014 6:12 a.m. PST

Yes, but not all the time. Also, don't forget satin finish and having a couple different brands of gloss (which will look different when applied).

A real nice scifi effect is: paint the figure black; light dry brush white; light dry brush neon color over that; light dry brush clear gloss enamel. You end up with a dark/black figure with "glowing" edges.

Cardinal Ximenez31 Dec 2014 2:17 p.m. PST

Yes.

I use the same process.

I brush clear gloss onto my SCW Civil Guard tricornios as a last step.

DM

Ottoathome31 Dec 2014 4:20 p.m. PST

I paint in gloss and leave it. Grumbacher Oils. Looks fine, wears long, stays true. I have figures I painted 40 years ago and been in hundreds of battles. No wear, no chip, no fading. I have acryllics only for painting terrain and even then I'm giving it up for gloss.

IronDuke596 Supporting Member of TMP01 Jan 2015 11:15 a.m. PST

I use Army painter dip for shading (oil based) but brushed on (for a hard protective finish as well) then dull coat as I do not like glossy figures. For a some figures I then gloss coat metallic items.

edmuel200003 Jan 2015 8:20 p.m. PST

Yes, I paint in flat and add a coat of flat clear--

I generally then go back and highlight metallics so that they have some "shine" (the amount and effect depending on the fig and item).

138SquadronRAF03 Jan 2015 8:58 p.m. PST

We used to do this in the 70's because gloss varnish was considered more durable than matt.

I gave up the practice of gloss varnishing in the early 80s.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.