Help support TMP


"horn: brass or bone?" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Painting Guides Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Column, Line and Square


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


1,673 hits since 15 Dec 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP15 Dec 2014 4:25 p.m. PST

I recently purchased a lot of Newline late war Prussians which included this Jager command group.

link

Is the horn carried by two figures actually a cow's horn (& hence, to be painted bone) or a representation of one but actually a brass instrument?

spontoon15 Dec 2014 7:10 p.m. PST

I'd go for silver mounted horn!

wrgmr115 Dec 2014 11:17 p.m. PST

Bone.

Oliver Schmidt15 Dec 2014 11:55 p.m. PST

Actually, German warriors two hundred years ago had changed a little bit since the Germanic times:

picture

The normal bugle in use by the Prussian army before and after 1806/7 was the Flügelhorn, also called Halbmond:

picture

link

PS. If the horn is supposed to be a drinking horn, the man is trying the wrong end:

picture

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP16 Dec 2014 3:17 a.m. PST

Actually, German warriors two hundred years ago had changed a little bit since the Germanic times:

Thank goodness they don't fight naked anymore. They seemed to have frightened the horse.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP16 Dec 2014 3:48 a.m. PST

normal bugle in use by the Prussian army

Yes, I know this. I was wondering if the Silesian Schutzen units might have used something non-standard to mirror their origins as game-keepers etc.

You may not be aware but there was a long standing tradition of European shepherds using cow horns from earliest times right up to the C19th.

link

Oliver Schmidt16 Dec 2014 5:29 a.m. PST

Actually, contrary to the two Jäger battalions (which were raised from huntsmen, their sons or the sons of rangers, and whose members after discharge received the right to be employed in the Royal forests), the Silesian Sharpshooter battalion (Schlesisches Schützen-Bataillon) was formed in November 1808 from the best light infantrymen selected from the units in Silesia, and did not enjoy this Jäger privilege.

Jäger and Schützen alike were armed with rifles, though, and all their buglers blew the Flügelhorn.

The article at your link has got some interesting facts, but it is a bit too free-associating for my taste, trying to span over 2000 years and the whole of Europe.

I don't know what civilian hunters' bugles looked like at the period.

xxxxxxx16 Dec 2014 8:16 a.m. PST

"German warriors two hundred years ago had changed a little bit"
hehehehehehehe – very funny!
:-)

- Sasha

xxxxxxx16 Dec 2014 12:04 p.m. PST

And after another 200 years the German warriors had changed a little bit more …..

picture

[Fallschirmjägerbataillon 373, Luftlandebrigade 31 "Oldenburg"]

:-)

- Sasha

Crucible Orc16 Dec 2014 9:26 p.m. PST

i have *never* seen a napoleonic soldure in miniature or illustration with that kind of horn before. hunting horns had been made out metal(usually brass) for at least 200 years prior to that.

the french horn, which began to be used in the early-mid 17th century, was adapted from common hunting horns of the period in Germany.

around that same period(mid 17th C) the last remaining common instrument made from an animal horn, the cornette(not the same as a cornet), was falling out of use.

by the beginning of the 19th century "horn"ed instruments were most certainly a thing of the past.

I'm confident my music history professor would agree.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP16 Dec 2014 10:35 p.m. PST

@ Crucible Orc

Many thanks. I'm "stuck" with the figures but I'll see what the horn looks like painted in brass.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP17 Dec 2014 3:15 a.m. PST

Brass looked execrable.

However, I found this:

link

I re-painted the horn bone wth blue-grey highlights then added silver mounts. It looks great.

The story will be the inhaber's wife bestowed a family heirloom to the battalion. Ha!

von Winterfeldt17 Dec 2014 3:30 a.m. PST

strange is this a G3 assault rifle which we used 40 years ago?

xxxxxxx17 Dec 2014 8:00 a.m. PST

Hans-Karl,

The weapon looks like a MSG90 A2 fitted with a Brügger & Thomet railed forend, this latter sporting both a vertical foregrip and the HK collapsable bipod. I would take this as a "sniper" (really more "counter-sniper") version of the G3 – likely issued to a limited number of "designated marksmen".

For airborne units, this might be thought to be (i) more portable and easier to supply than specialist sniper rifles (such as the .50 caliber long range designs), while being (ii) more accurate (<1 MOA vs. 1.5 MOA at 100m) and possibly more reliable than alternatives such as the HK417-based G28.

It is a currently produced item.
See : link

Sometimes older is better. In the US service, after years of depots and arsenals scavenging and rebuilding 50+ year-old Colt M1911 .45 ACP pistols for special forces users, Colts finally received a recent contract for new production.

I loved the M1911, and was very pleased that I left uniformed service before anyone tried to force the Baretta 9mm on my unit. They were already doing some testing, and some of our guys did try the Beretta 92 (the base for the development of the M9). But it was such a little, light thing …. you couldn't even hammer a nail with it.
:-)

- Sasha

von Winterfeldt17 Dec 2014 8:42 a.m. PST

Yes seemingly the G3 also performed well in hot climate where the most recent assault rifle failed to hit due to construction problems and of course you are right about the modifications – I wonder why they did not use the AK 47

"MSG90 A2 fitted with a Brügger & Thomet railed forend, this latter sporting both a vertical foregrip and the HK collapsable bipod. I would take this as a "sniper" (really more "counter-sniper") version of the G3 – likely issued to a limited number of "designated marksmen".

xxxxxxx17 Dec 2014 9:17 a.m. PST

"I wonder why they did not use the AK 47"

I can imagine a few technical or tactical issues …. but more likely it is a "preference for German industry".

I never carried the AK-47, but my cousin did while a junior office of special forces in Viet Nam – before deciding to switch to the M79 40mm grenade launcher.

- Sasha

Musketier21 Dec 2014 8:25 a.m. PST

Sometimes older is better.

I understand that, though officially withdrawn years ago, a few G3 per squad have mysteriously reappeared in German units sent to Afghanistan once it was discovered it could punch through the local mud walls, while the newer weapons' lighter ammo could not.

Oh, and those horns are ridiculous. I really expected better research from Newline!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.