Help support TMP


"Depicting Andalusians on the table" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tactica Medieval Rulebook


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Movie Review


1,102 hits since 2 Nov 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Longstrider02 Nov 2014 6:30 a.m. PST

So I've been trying to decide which Saga Cross & Crescent to do, and I'm pretty close to settling on The Moors. That said, Iberia was conquered in 711 and it was over 300 years before the Almoravids turned up, so I'm thinking of narrowing down to painting up some models that look like they'd be around during the time of the Caliphate of Cordoba – this would be from 200 to 300 years after the conquest.

In this period, how would I go about representing the soliders of, say, a city militia? Would most of the soldiers available to Cordoba look and dress in long robes and turbans, or trousers and bareheaded, or some other combination? I was flipping through an Osprey on The Moors recently and it seems that aside from the patterned robes and shields (frankly this is most of the reason I'm interested – it looks a lot more colourful than other options) troops would run the gamut of Mediterranean looks from hair colour, hairstyle, mail coats, helmet shape, and shield shape.

If so, I'm thinking of maybe getting the Gripping Beast plastics box and supplementing it with some Andalusian troops from the Artizan line, and possibly some of the Conquest plastics to kitbash with. Does that make a reasonable amount of sense? If nothing else, if I can't… Andalusianise the Normans enough, I could use them to represent Iberian Christian mercenaries hired by a local governor or the like.

Tl;dr what did Andalusian military forces look like from ~929-1031 or so?

Oh Bugger02 Nov 2014 7:08 a.m. PST

Many Berbers have fair hair even now and its likely more did then. Just saying in case you go that way.

Jimmy da Purple02 Nov 2014 8:39 a.m. PST

The Warhammer Historical book on the Reconquista is a good source. Its what I used.

Codsticker02 Nov 2014 9:51 a.m. PST

Hi Longstrider, I commented in your your thread on the Saga Forums so you know what I think: I would use a mix of the GB plastics and Conquest Normans with head scarves around their helmets and sashes about their wastes.

WillieB02 Nov 2014 10:07 a.m. PST

Saw some really nice Gripping Beast Andalusian infantry packs yesterday at Crisis in Antwerp.

skipper John02 Nov 2014 12:27 p.m. PST

I was looking at Saga Moors myself. Spent several hours reading the arguments on skin color. I never even got started on what they wore. Good luck!

Longstrider02 Nov 2014 6:33 p.m. PST

I'm surprised there's really much to argue about as far as skin colour goes, anyhow. I suspect if you were to sample a bunch of people living in the western mediterranean anytime over the last two thousand years you'd get a pretty wide mix.

I'll see if I can get a hold of the WAB book, seems difficult these days but we'll see. As for metal figs, I'd expect the Beast ones would be pretty nice, but it's a matter of both price (and I'm not a good enough painter where the time I spend on the miniatures outweighs the cost of the models themselves – a thing I hope that some of the colourful nature of al-Andalus will help with). I'll check out their store when it's back to functioning again.

And thanks, Codsticker. I hadn't checked the ST forums for a couple days, and followed your link to the Warseer thread where your frankly brilliant models are on display. Very inspiring, I must say.

I'm thinking at the moment I might just go for a box of the plastic Arabs and a Norman knights box, and represent a group of Christians hired alongside some Arabized sorts, and then pick up a box of Norman foot on which I can experiment with greenstuff sashes and scarves.

Cacique Caribe02 Nov 2014 6:44 p.m. PST

Warhammer Reconquista was fun, back when I was gaming 28mm historicals:

link
link
link

Sadly, my Andalusian and Almoravid figures and terrain are now stored away in bins, waiting to be put up for sale at some point in the near future.

Dan

Druzhina02 Nov 2014 8:00 p.m. PST
Codsticker03 Nov 2014 9:54 a.m. PST

One of the interesting things about those illustrations is there is virtually no difference between the Christian Spanish and Muslim Spanish and very little armour. Although in some of the illustrations it looks like the artist made an attempt to represent curly hair.

Druzhina03 Nov 2014 5:31 p.m. PST

The term Mozarabic refers to the Mozarabs (from musta'rab meaning "Arabized"), Iberian Christians living in Al-Andalus. It is not always clear if biblical characters are being portrayed as contemporary Christians or Muslims.

Druzhina
Spanish & North African Illustrations of Costume & Soldiers

Codsticker03 Nov 2014 6:59 p.m. PST

I was under the impression that medieval artists generally portrayed philistines and such as Muslims or Arabs. I suppose Mozarabs would have had to have been sensitive about those portrayals and perhaps generic-ified Christians and Muslims in illuminations.

Lewisgunner04 Nov 2014 4:14 a.m. PST

Contemporary sources show either lots of mail or none. I honestly think it is a matter of the artists preference. Cloth suits particularly well the flowing whorl like style of many Beatus manuscripts, armour is rather dark and sinister. I wouldn't say that any of the illustrations is unrealistic, rather that they are not a good source for us to decide how much armour is around.

Codsticker04 Nov 2014 9:07 a.m. PST

I may be wrong as I am going by memory, but if the Osprey books are anything to go by, then armour is mentioned more in manuscripts then it is shown in illustration or sculpture. I am speaking specifically of the 10th C.; by the late 11th C. there seems to be more representation of armour. Perhaps that is an indication of artists becoming more skilled in the representation of those kinds of details more than an indication of the presence of armour.

Longstrider04 Nov 2014 11:12 a.m. PST

Thanks Druzhina. I'm not familiar with the right techniques to interpret imagery from illuminated texts, but they're definitely interesting to look at, so I'm going to spend a while to try and parse them.

I'm using the miniatures mostly for playing Saga, and I'm inclined to go earlier rather than later since most of the other folks have Viking sorts, so I'm looking at 8th and 9th centuries mainly, so the GBP plastics with the long robes seem like they might suit for that.

I've got some bits from the other GB plastics boxes to fiddle around with for different head styles, and maybe see if I can kitbash and convert some combination of armour and cloth that looks nice. Saga itself is a ruleset that goes for evocative rather than detailed anyway, so I feel it's perhaps the right approach as well for my models.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.