Help support TMP


"Small Arms in the Atlanta Campaign" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Stars & Bars


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Cavalry

Fernando Enterprises paints Union cavalry and Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian bases them up.


854 hits since 7 Oct 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Cleburne186307 Oct 2014 5:59 a.m. PST

Hello all,

Is there any literature out there detailing the small arms used by the opposing forces in the Atlanta Campaign? I have the ordnance reports from the OR, but I thought I'd ask if there were any dedicated books, thesis, or other studies out there that I was not aware of.

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP07 Oct 2014 7:28 a.m. PST

The Confederates were very mixed. I have access to some division and corps returns from the first half of 1864 that indicate many Confederate units had mixed shoulder arms, ranging from the ubiquitous Springfield and Enfield through Austrian, Belgian, and even Mississippi rifles to .69 caliber smoothbore muskets.

The returns don't cover the entire Army of Tennessee but do have a significant portion of it. Some of them only give gross figures for a division but some go down to regimental level.

I'm trying to get them extracted so I can depict on-hand strengths and the mix of weapons.

One example is from April 1864:

Finley's Florida Brigade, Bate's Division

1st & 3rd Fla [Cav] – 371 men on-hand with 51 .577 caliber, 41 .58 caliber, and 70 .69 caliber Belgian rifled muskets, and 172 .69 caliber percussion muskets (presumably smoothbores).

1st Fla Inf – 312 men on-hand with 90 .57 caliber, 105 .58 cal, 57 .69 caliber Belgian, 26 .69 caliber percussion.

6th Fla Inf – 246 men on-hand with 29 .577 caliber, 67 .58 caliber, 55 .69 caliber Belgian, and 106 .69 caliber percussion.

7th Fla Inf – 267 men on-hand with 176 .57 caliber, 55 .58 caliber, 40. 70 caliber British, and 5 .69 calliber Belgian.

But others, such as Strahl's Tennessee Brigade of Cheatham's Division (also Apr 1864) had only a single caliber weapon in each regiment:

4th Tenn Inf – 128 men on-hand with 123 .577 caliber
5th Tenn Inf – 139 men on-hand with 141 .577 caliber
19th Tenn Inf – 182 men on-hand with 174 .577 caliber
24th Tenn Inf – 185 men on-hand with 181 .577 caliber
31st Tenn Inf – 143 men on-hand with 133 .54 caliber Austrian
33rd Tenn Inf – 121 men on-hand with 101 .54 caliber Austrian

Hope this helps.

Jim

panzerCDR07 Oct 2014 9:31 a.m. PST

Ouch! I would have hated to be the Quartermaster in charge of all the different ammo for those units, though perhaps whoever was casting the different minie balls had it all under control at the munitions factory.

TKindred Supporting Member of TMP07 Oct 2014 9:52 a.m. PST

Keep in mind that the CS Ordnance Department, like their federal counterparts, produced only a .57 caliber round so as to service both the .577 & .58 weapons. Same thing with the .54/.55 calibers. One slightly reduced round served both systems.

In addition, those units with mixed weapons didn't have them issued throughout the regiment. They were issued by company, and many of the CS units with those issues had the rifles given to the flank companies and the smoothbores issued to the center companies. This was in keeping with Scott's Tactics where the flank companies acted like light infantry, as was common in the Napoleonic period. In the ACW they became the skirmishers for the battalion.

One other point: Although .69 caliber minnie' rounds were manufactured and issued, the most common round for the .69 weapons was the "buck & ball" round. Having said that, the only way to know for certain what rounds were issued to whom & when would be to find the ordnance issue records and/or ordnance inspection reports for the individual units/brigades.

For most rules sets, though, that shouldn't matter much.

panzerCDR07 Oct 2014 9:59 a.m. PST

TKindred – Thanks for the information.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.