Help support TMP


"Ukraine Coaxes Its Ancient, Giant Seaplanes Back ..." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Gangstas

Adam practices his white techniques on some Thugs.


Featured Profile Article

Magnets: N52 Versus N42

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian wants to know if you can tell the difference between weaker and stronger magnets with 3mm aircraft.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


974 hits since 19 Sep 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0119 Sep 2014 10:32 p.m. PST

,,,Into the Air.

"The Soviet Union designed the Beriev Be-12 seaplane in the late 1950s to hunt NATO submarines. Improving enemy air defenses doomed the slow, ungainly amphibian in that role, so it switched to patrol and search and rescue.

When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, Ukraine inherited a handful of the 32-ton seaplanes. But Kiev could never afford to maintain the increasingly geriatric patrollers—especially considering what saltwater does to metal.

But it was the Russian invasion of Crimea in the spring of 2014 that really did in the Ukrainian seaplane force. And it was Russian … largess—for lack of a better term—that helped Kiev coax one Beriev back into the air…"

link

Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

John the OFM20 Sep 2014 7:39 a.m. PST

That should turn the tide.

Mardaddy20 Sep 2014 8:46 a.m. PST

I like it.

Great War Ace20 Sep 2014 8:54 a.m. PST

No way would I go up in one of those. That was my immediate impression on looking at the photo….

HammerHead20 Sep 2014 9:15 a.m. PST

32 ton ! Wow

Lion in the Stars20 Sep 2014 10:04 a.m. PST

I'm amazed that beast is still keeping water out of the hull…

Years of neglect like that, it's probably faster and cheaper to rebuild than repair.

Deadone20 Sep 2014 3:04 p.m. PST

Waste of cash that would be better spent on bringing back some more of the mothballed Su-25/-25/MiG-29S or T-64/-80 back to service.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.