Help support TMP


"Basing for Fire When Ready rules?" Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Tony Builds and Paints a Khang Robot

Tony shows how he puts together and paints a Flash Gordon-inspired sci-fi pulp robot.


1,060 hits since 6 Sep 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Prince Alberts Revenge06 Sep 2014 3:18 p.m. PST

So, I just received my Navwar fleets for the battle of Lemnos and planned to base them prior to painting. Its been a while since I played Fire when Ready, but recall that bases had angles on the front. I am out of my old, custom bases that I once purchased for this set and don't feel like ordering more.

How do others base for Fire When Ready? Should I just base normally and figure out how to turn another way? Switch to WTJ's Quickfire rules? Thanks for any help!

Personal logo Yellow Admiral Supporting Member of TMP10 Sep 2014 9:23 p.m. PST

The cool FWR basing system isn't strictly necessary. My RJW ships are mounted on rectangular bases slightly longer than hull length, rounded up to the nearest 1 cm, because I didn't want to do any special basing for one rule set that might make it hard to play other rules. When using a friend's miniatures based on totally non-standard hand-made bases we just rounded up to the nearest 1cm when moving forward between course changes (e.g., when turning a CA on a 54mm long base, we just moved it 6 cm on each leg of the turn).

Rounding to the nearest 1cm seems to work well enough for FWR, but research shows that turning radius is not related to hull length in such a linear fashion. The hull:beam ratio is a better general rule of thumb (lower ratios tend to turn tighter), but tactical radius can also vary wildly with speed, depth of water under the hull, amount of roll during a turn, underwater hull form, type of rudder, and on and on [and on [and on [and on…]]]. If you could find the information, it would be better to just look up the published tactical radius of each ship and use it as an individual statistic, and accept that this is a guideline based on practical experience and not an absolute measurement. Unfortunately, the farther in the past you go from WWII, the harder that information is to find. This information is difficult or impossible to find for ships of the pre-dreadnought period.

- Ix

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.