Help support TMP


"Naval Thunder 1/6000 Table Size" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Small Scale Ships with M.Y. Miniatures

Mal Wright Fezian's first experience with 1:4800 scale naval models.


1,325 hits since 19 Aug 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

FatherLucant19 Aug 2014 4:30 p.m. PST

After reading some rave reviews for Naval Thunder I decided to take the plunge and buy the books and some 1/6000 minis.

After a brief glance at some scenarios I saw that they table size was asking for some bigger tables than what I thought was needed for such a small scale.

Is there any official change of measurements for different scales, or do they rules want me to still play on a bigger table no matter the scale.

*I have a 4x4 table, and that's about as big as I can go in my apartment, less the wife sink me.

hindsTMP Supporting Member of TMP19 Aug 2014 6:13 p.m. PST

Use your 4x4 table, and just multiply all distances (ground scale) by some constant; for example in your case, by 1/2. This works with any ruleset, and will not distort the results. This makes sense, in that if you cut ranges in half, and also cut movement in half, the relative displacement of playing pieces is unchanged.

The only possible issue is that the physical size of models/bases forces a lower limit as to how far apart 2 ships can be. If this occurs, it can be handled with simple house rules.

MH

FatherLucant19 Aug 2014 8:11 p.m. PST

Coolio, I figured that was going to happen.

Thanks.

boy wundyr x20 Aug 2014 8:44 a.m. PST

Or use cm instead of inches, which is just a bit more than cutting everything in half (10mm vs. 12.5mm) and you can use metric rulers/measuring tape without any math.

Personal logo Yellow Admiral Supporting Member of TMP21 Aug 2014 8:26 a.m. PST

I highly recommend this latter idea (substitute cm for inches when making measurements). I've been doing this for about 15 years with the old General Quarters rules in order to scale them down for 1/6000 miniatures. It works brilliantly, since most rules (including NT) are scaled to work with 1/2400 miniatures by default, 1/2400 is 2.5 times bigger than 1/6000 scale, and an inch is 2.5 times bigger than a cm. It's much faster to play the game if you don't have to do any math in your head or make whole new charts with adjusted measurements.

- Ix

hindsTMP Supporting Member of TMP21 Aug 2014 3:19 p.m. PST

It's much faster to play the game if you don't have to do any math in your head or make whole new charts with adjusted measurements.

True.

I made new charts for General Quarters I and II, mostly for atmosphere so that everything is in yards. It just sounds better than "Admiral, we have sighted the enemy bearing WNW at 23 inches…". Once this was done, I merely adjust my measuring sticks (or hex grids) so 1000 yards was an appropriate distance for my table.

Some newer rule sets (like General Quarters 3 and presumably FAI) already specify ranges in yards; not sure about Naval Thunder.

Mark

FatherLucant21 Aug 2014 7:21 p.m. PST

I fooled around with the game a bit, and really like the idea of changing everything into cm's. Think that's the way I'm going to play from now on.

Also got my figurehead ships in, really excited about em!

Thanks again for the advice y'all

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.