Help support TMP


"No U.S. - Russia Nuclear Defense For Real-Life ... " Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

C in C's Heavy Hover Tank

From a little-known range of science-fiction microarmor: the Heavy Hover Tank from C in C.


Featured Profile Article

The Magravite in the Age of Madness

Planning an army for Warfare in the Age of Madness, using some of the Colony-15 figures.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


554 hits since 5 Aug 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0105 Aug 2014 9:45 p.m. PST

…‘Armageddon' Asteroid Threats.

"The U.S. Energy Department, apparently, is being forced to close its eyes.

Rising tensions between the United States and Russia, stemming from the latter's recent aggressions, have upended the Obama administration's ambitious Russia "reset"—and with it, the once-promising U.S.-Russian plans to destroy killer asteroids with nuclear bombs.

On Sunday, The New York Times ran a story detailing how the Ukraine crisis has stalled an accord that promised "one of the most expansive collaborations ever between the countries' nuclear scientists, including reciprocal visits to atomic sites to work on projects ranging from energy to planetary defense." Some of those plans for planetary defense sound like they were ripped right out of a Michael Bay movie…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1106 Aug 2014 4:01 p.m. PST

Clearly, the "reset" has occurred, but didn't quite work out as expected.

Perhaps, if the correct verbiage for the button had been used, things would be better now………

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.