Help support TMP


"C-130 Airlifter: The Most Successful Military Aircraft Ever" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Fight's On Surface-to-Air Missile Site

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is painting some ground targets as he needs them.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Train Tracks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian checks out some 10/15mm railroad tracks for wargaming.


Current Poll


981 hits since 5 Aug 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0105 Aug 2014 9:15 p.m. PST

"Later this year, the U.S. Air Force will do something unprecedented. It will sign a contract to purchase more tactical airlifters from a program that first began turning out planes 60 years ago. The latest version of the plane is called the C-130J Super Hercules, and if you measure success in the military aircraft business by how many users a plane has, how many missions it performs, or how long it has been in continuous production, then Hercules is hands down the most successful military aircraft ever. This month marks the 60th anniversary of the plane's first flight on August 23, 1954.

How long ago was that? Most of the music being sold in the U.S. back then consisted of 78 R.P.M. records. A majority of residential phones were on "party lines," meaning your neighbor could listen in on your calls. There were only three television networks that mattered, and they broadcast exclusively in black-and-white. Microwave ovens cost thousands of dollars — tens of thousands in today's dollars — and you couldn't get a deal on one at WalMart because WalMart didn't exist. The Worldwide Web would not appear for another 40 years.

The idea that an Air Force contract awarded during the Truman Administration — on July 2, 1951 — could lead to a plane that not only is still in production today, but in high demand around the world, is simply incredible. But it's true: there are 2,000 C-130s of various vintages and configurations currently in use, and prime-contractor Lockheed Martin LMT -0.81% keeps finding new uses for the plane (the latest versions are for maritime patrol and commercial operations). All of the U.S. armed forces including the Coast Guard depend on Hercules, as do the vast majority of militaries in the Western Hemisphere, Southeast Asia, Western Europe and Arabia…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

BattlerBritain06 Aug 2014 2:18 a.m. PST

Last I heard the US had a couple of hundred C-130s in storage in the Nevada desert.

Still, a few more shiny new toys never hurt wink

GarrisonMiniatures06 Aug 2014 5:48 a.m. PST

Not sure – DC3/C47 was around 20 years earlier, lots more were built and used by Russia/China as well as Western and non-aligned States, many are still flying with civil airlines.

I'd prefer to call it a draw.

jpattern206 Aug 2014 7:10 a.m. PST

Definitely a workhorse. I still prefer the lines of the DC-3/C-47, but that's down to personal preference.

And both of them served as AC gunships, so they have that in common, too.

Personal logo McKinstry Supporting Member of TMP Fezian06 Aug 2014 8:09 a.m. PST

Last I heard the US had a couple of hundred C-130s in storage in the Nevada desert.

Saw a bunch of them on a tour of the Boneyard just last month. Mostly earlier models.

HammerHead06 Aug 2014 1:36 p.m. PST

Fine aircraft,don't see why the herc can' t carry on for many years yet

Mako1106 Aug 2014 4:04 p.m. PST

My vote goes to the B-52, though perhaps the C-130 is the most successful "cargo aircraft" ever.

14Bore06 Aug 2014 4:41 p.m. PST

Most exciting ride I ever had in a aircraft was in a C-130 Going from England to Germany. The pilot must have thought he was in a F-15C because he tried to do a vertical take off. And when we landed I think he thought he was in going into a grass field under fire.

BattlerBritain07 Aug 2014 4:44 a.m. PST

That sounds like a 'Khe-Sahn' approach.

Fly in at 10k ft+, chop the throttles, flaps 50%, stick nose down to at least 60degs down, pull stick back at last moment to avoid the 'cumulo-granite' and prey the brakes work.

And whilst still rolling invite the 'self-loading freight' to exit via the back door.

Gulik2307 Aug 2014 6:16 a.m. PST

I rode a C-130 into Bagram with a bunch of Hog drivers--the load master came back to warn us we were doing a "combat landing", which was a lot like what you're describing. Needless to say, the Hog drivers weren't impressed, but I thought it was a helluva ride.

Lion in the Stars07 Aug 2014 10:04 a.m. PST

I think half the time the Hog drivers are doing 'combat landings' like that, too. They sure don't seem to do many normal approaches at the local airport!

Tango0107 Aug 2014 11:03 a.m. PST

I travel in one C-130 back to 1982.
It wasn't a comfortable journey! (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars07 Aug 2014 9:07 p.m. PST

Of course it wasn't, Armand, the Air Force wanted to make sure you'd get out of the aircraft and fight so they tried to make you miserable on the trip over!

We did the same thing to Marines in the US Navy.

The real reason I think the C130 is better than the DC3 is that the C130 is still being produced 60 years later. Properly maintained, aircraft last a very, very long time, so of course there are still DC3s flying. Douglas made more than 10,000 of them! But DC3s haven't been built since the 1940s.

Tango0107 Aug 2014 11:04 p.m. PST

Two C-130J Super Hercules succesfully employed air to air tactics against F-16 Fighting Falcon.

See the article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Tango0107 Aug 2014 11:05 p.m. PST

My dear friend… "miserable" is the word to be used from the first minut of that campaing… (smile).

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.